| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,19 @@ |
|
1 |
+===1=== |
|
2 |
+The neg can't read an NC that says the aff has the burden to prove that it is possible for a state to impose a limitation of qualified immunity and turn the case. |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+===2=== |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+====Their argument is crime securitization—that justifies massive oppression.==== |
|
9 |
+**Simon '02** (Jonathan, Associate Dean of the Jurisprudence and Social Policy Program at Boalt Hall School of Law at University of California, Berkeley, "Crime, Community, and Criminal Justice," California Law Review, Vol. 90 No. 5 Oct 2002) PO |
|
10 |
+American communities have been transformed since the 1970s by two trends. The first is |
|
11 |
+AND |
|
12 |
+be the most important government officials with power over the lives of residents. |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+====Reps come first==== |
|
16 |
+**Bleiker '03** (Bleiker, Roland. "Discourse and human agency." Contemporary Political Theory2.1 (2003): 25-47.) |
|
17 |
+'It is within discourse,' one of Foucault's much rehearsed passages (1976 |
|
18 |
+AND |
|
19 |
+saturated with reason that their emergence out of unreason thereby becomes improbable.' |