| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,12 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Static identity exists—even reductionism presupposes a transcendental unity of self-consciousness. ==== |
|
2 |
+**Kant** (Immanuel, Critique of Pure Reason, 1787, translated by J.M.D. Meiklejohn, Gutenberg, http://www.gutenberg.org/files/4280/4280-h/4280-h.htm) OS |
|
3 |
+The "I think" must accompany all my representations, for otherwise something would |
|
4 |
+AND |
|
5 |
+exception belong to me. From this primitive conjunction follow many important results. |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+====Prefer a practical to ontological understanding of identity—a practical static identity is inescapable.==== |
|
9 |
+**Korsgaard** (Christine, "Personal identity and the unity of agency: A Kantian response to Parfit," 1989, Philosophy and Public Affairs 18, no. 2: 101-132, http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/3219881/Korsgaard_UnityofAgency.pdf?sequence=2) OS |
|
10 |
+Still, Parfit might reply that all this concedes his point about the insignificance of |
|
11 |
+AND |
|
12 |
+agent. As things stand, it is the basic kind of agent. |