| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,39 @@ |
|
1 |
+Same case proper |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+===Underview=== |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+====Abstraction is great.==== |
|
7 |
+**Farr '02** |
|
8 |
+Arnold Farr (prof of phil @ UKentucky, focusing on German idealism, philosophy of race, postmodernism, psychoanalysis, and liberation philosophy). "Can a Philosophy of Race Afford to Abandon the Kantian Categorical Imperative?" JOURNAL of SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY, Vol. 33 No. 1, Spring 2002, 17–32. JDN. |
|
9 |
+Whereas most criticisms are aimed at the formulation of universal law and the formula of |
|
10 |
+AND |
|
11 |
+equally deplorable to reject the categorical imperative without first exploring its emancipatory potential. |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+====This outweighs—problems with ethical theories stem from the nature of us, not moral phil.==== |
|
15 |
+**Wood** ~~Kantian Ethics ALLEN W. WOOD Stanford University~~ |
|
16 |
+There is no plausibility at all, for example, in the suggestion that such |
|
17 |
+AND |
|
18 |
+itself is actually responsible for a lot of the evil that people do. |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+====Ideal theory provides a fixed goal.==== |
|
22 |
+**Swift '12:** (Adam Swift, British Poliicla Philosopher, Oxford University "Ideal and Nonideal Theory" Oxford Handbooks Online. June 2012. FT) |
|
23 |
+Suppose our ideal theory correctly identifies the long-term goal we want to achieve |
|
24 |
+AND |
|
25 |
+latter, Simmons is right that we do need it for the former. |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+ |
|
28 |
+====Ideal theory is in no way incompatible with a radical agenda—broad principles can inspire broad sweeping change and allow previously-excluded groups to claim political agency.==== |
|
29 |
+**Holmstrom **~~Holmstrom, Nancy ~~Prof. Emeritus @ Rutgers~~. "Response to Charles Mills's." Radical Philosophy Review 15.2 (2012): 325-330.~~ |
|
30 |
+We have to speak to people where they are, he says, and that |
|
31 |
+AND |
|
32 |
+socialists of all kinds helped to build the labor and civil rights movements.' |
|
33 |
+ |
|
34 |
+====Try or die for meta-ethics debate—it solves extinction of the entire galaxy.==== |
|
35 |
+**Muehlhauser 11** |
|
36 |
+Muehlhauser, Luke (Executive director at the Singularity Institute). "The Urgent Meta-Ethics of Friendly Artificial Intelligence." LessWrong. 01 February 2011. JDN. http://lesswrong.com/lw/43v/the_urgent_metaethics_of_friendly_artificial/ |
|
37 |
+Barring a major collapse of human civilization (due to nuclear war, asteroid impact |
|
38 |
+AND |
|
39 |
+universe will not wait for the pace of traditional philosophy to catch up. |