Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[22]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[22]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,97 +1,0 @@
1		-===Framework===
2		-
3		-
4		-====The existence of extrinsic goodness requires unconditional human worth—that means we must treat others as ends in themselves.====
5		-**Korsgaard '83** (Christine M., "Two Distinctions in Goodness," The Philosophical Review Vol. 92, No. 2 (Apr., 1983), pp. 169-195, JSTOR) OS
6		-The argument shows how Kant's idea of justification works. It can be read as
7		-AND
8		--and, in general, to make the highest good our end.
9		-
10		-
11		-====The standard is consistency with universal law.====
12		-
13		-
14		-====Practical reason solves regress—it's impossible to deny reason's authority.====
15		-**Velleman** (David, "Self To Self", Cambridge University Press, 2006, pg 18-19)
16		-As we have seen, requirements that depend for their force on some external source
17		-AND
18		-something self-defeating about asking for a reason to act for reasons.
19		-
20		-
21		-====~~2~~ Only the categorical imperative allows for an autonomous will—my framework is self-imposed by the structure of the will, so the will can be the cause of itself.====
22		-**Korsgaard** (Christine, Morality as Freedom, http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~~korsgaar/CMK.Morality.as.Freedom.pdf) OS
23		-We are here confronted with a deep problem of a familiar kind. If you
24		-AND
25		-be an autonomous will at all. It has to choose a law.
26		-
27		-
28		-====All claims to freedom are provisional until brought under the public right. It is a contradiction to will a world in which one's will can be denied—this necessitates an omnilateral will. ====
29		-**Kant** (Immanuel Kant, Critique of Pure Reason, 1781) ***bracketed for gendered language***
30		-When I declare (by word or deed), "I will that an external
31		-AND
32		-a thing can be externally yours or mine only in a civil society.
33		-
34		-
35		-===Advocacy===
36		-
37		-
38		-====I defend the resolution as a general principle. Specific type of limiting is irrelevant—it's a question of the general maxim behind QI. You can link disads to any type of QI limitation.====
39		-
40		-
41		-===Contention 1 is Tort Law===
42		-
43		-
44		-====QI stops tort litigation.====
45		-**Chen 06**
46		-Chen, Alan K. (Professor @ University of Denver Sturm College of Law)"The Facts about Qualified Immunity." Emory Law Journal 55.2 (2006): 229-278. ~~Premier~~
47		-The law provides a damages action to people whose constitutional rights have been violated
48		-AND
49		-acts. 24 She may still, however, assert qualified immunity.
50		-
51		-
52		-====That's a violation of universal law—both positive and negative duties obligate us to always pay damages.====
53		-**Ripstein 04 **
54		-Arthur, pf of law @ UToronto, PUBLIC LAW AND LEGAL THEORY RESEARCH PAPER NO. 04-02 THE DIVISION OF RESPONSIBILITY AND THE LAW OF TORT ARTHUR ~~Premier~~
55		-All of these effects that one person might have on another are consistent with each
56		-AND
57		-to your ability to set and pursue your own conception of the good.
58		-
59		-
60		-===Contention 2 is the Constitution===
61		-
62		-
63		-====And, QI means we never clearly define constitutional rights, which causes infinite violations over time.====
64		-**Beerman 9**
65		-Jack Michael Beermann (Professor of Law and Harry Elwood Warren Scholar, Boston University School of Law). "Qualified Immunity And Constitutional Avoidance." Boston University School of Law Working Paper No. 09-51 (December 2, 2009). http://www.bu.edu/law/workingpapers-archive/documents/beermannj120209.pdf ~~Premier~~
66		-Pearson is another entry in the Court's struggle to resolve a serious problem created by
67		-AND
68		-federal courts were required to reach the constitutional merits before deciding on immunity.
69		-
70		-
71		-===Contention 3 is Police===
72		-
73		-
74		-====Lawsuits solve rights violations.====
75		-**Gilles '01** (Mirriam, Assistant Professor, Cardozo Law School, "In Defense of making Government Pay: The Deterrent Effect of Constitutional Tort Remedies," Georgia Law Review, Vol. 35, 2001.) OS bracketed for gender
76		-The question of whether constitutional tort remedies serve any deterrent effect is, I think
77		-AND
78		-the knowledge that a suspect might sue for damages has no inhibitory effect.
79		-
80		-
81		-===Underview===
82		-
83		-
84		-====Abstraction is great.====
85		-**Farr '02**
86		-Arnold Farr (prof of phil @ UKentucky, focusing on German idealism, philosophy of race, postmodernism, psychoanalysis, and liberation philosophy). "Can a Philosophy of Race Afford to Abandon the Kantian Categorical Imperative?" JOURNAL of SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY, Vol. 33 No. 1, Spring 2002, 17–32. JDN.
87		-Whereas most criticisms are aimed at the formulation of universal law and the formula of
88		-AND
89		-equally deplorable to reject the categorical imperative without first exploring its emancipatory potential.
90		-
91		-
92		-====The Kantian subject is the embodied subject.====
93		-**Farr '02**
94		-Arnold Farr (prof of phil @ UKentucky, focusing on German idealism, philosophy of race, postmodernism, psychoanalysis, and liberation philosophy). "Can a Philosophy of Race Afford to Abandon the Kantian Categorical Imperative?" JOURNAL of SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY, Vol. 33 No. 1, Spring 2002, 17–32.
95		-One of the most popular criticisms of Kant's moral philosophy is that it is too
96		-AND
97		-choosing my maxims I attempt to include the perspective of other moral agents.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-11-04 22:12:32.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-louie kollar

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-millard north gb

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-13

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Cambridge Rindge Sussman Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-nd - 1ac - qANTified immANUELity

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-apple valley