Changes for page Cambridge Rindge Sussman Aff
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:34
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[21]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,7 +1,0 @@ 1 -The neg can't read a theory shell that indicts potential 1ar extrapolation or shift until after that's occurred. 2 - 3 -If the neg reads a counterplan, they must read carded evidence that explicitly advocates all planks of it. 4 - 5 -If debaters argue that the role of the ballot is to endorse the best method for black-empowerment, they must specify whether we use an ends-based or means-based decision metric. 6 - 7 -If debaters justify competing interpretations, they must specify what their conception of competing interps means, specifically whether we use a norm-setting model or in-round abuse model, whether I need an explicit competitive counter-interp, and whether I can beat their shell on defense alone. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-10-14 03:34:47.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -12 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Cambridge Rindge Sussman Aff - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - broken interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -all