| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,21 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Counterplan text: we should refuse to be happy or complicit within systems of oppression, except we should be happy when challenging oppression.==== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+====It's competitive—"Within" is defined as "inside (something)" by Google Dictionary (https://www.google.com/search?q=within+definitionandoq=within+definitionandaqs=chrome.0.0l6.1967j0j1andsourceid=chromeandie=UTF-8) so the aff defends we shouldn't even be happy when fighting oppression since we're still within oppressive systems.==== |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+====Net benefits:==== |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+====~~1~~ Violence is inevitable—it's constitutive of metaphysics.==== |
|
11 |
+~~Martin **Hagglund** (2006): The Necessity of Discrimination Disjoining Derrida and Levinas.~~ |
|
12 |
+Last but not least, for Derrida the trace is concomitant with the necessity of |
|
13 |
+AND |
|
14 |
+well as the chance that the prevalent order may be transformed or subverted. |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+====But hedonism is true—pain is bad and pleasure is good, so we should be happy within oppressive systems.==== |
|
18 |
+Neil **Sinhababu '13** The Epistemic Argument for Hedonism, Associate Professor of Philosophy, National University of Singapore, Meta-Ethics, Philosophy of Action, Nietzsche, National University of Singapore |
|
19 |
+Even though phenomenal introspection only tells me about my own phenomenal states, I can |
|
20 |
+AND |
|
21 |
+favors the kind of universal hedonism that supports utilitarianism, not egoistic hedonism. |