| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,27 @@ |
|
1 |
+====The GCB exists.==== |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+====~~1~~ The modal ontological argument—the GCB's existence in a possible world implies necessary existence in our world.==== |
|
5 |
+**Himma **(Kenneth Einar Himma, Seattle Pacific University, "Anselm: Ontological Argument for God's Existence," IEP, http://www.iep.utm.edu/ont-arg/~~#H4) OS |
|
6 |
+Perhaps the most influential of contemporary modal arguments is Plantinga's version. Plantinga begins by |
|
7 |
+AND |
|
8 |
+in every possible world. Here is a schematic representation of the argument: |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+====~~3~~ Possibility requires a being that coninstantiates all positive predicates.==== |
|
13 |
+**Chignell** (Andrew Chignell, Philosophy Prof at Cornell, one of the foremost scholars on Kant, Kant, Modality, and the Most Real Being, Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 91 (2):157-19, 2009) OS |
|
14 |
+A few preliminary remarks about these: First, note that Kant takes objects as |
|
15 |
+AND |
|
16 |
+or derivable from necessarily instantiated predicates in a way that explains their harmony. |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+====Thus, the standard is consistency with the GCB's will.==== |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+====Negating is the squo—colleges have unconstitutional speech codes.==== |
|
24 |
+**FIRE '17 **~~Foundation for Individual Rights in Education. "State of the Law: Speech Codes." 2017. Web. https://www.thefire.org/in-court/state-of-the-law-speech-codes/~~ |
|
25 |
+FIRE defines a speech code as any campus regulation that punishes, forbids, heavily |
|
26 |
+AND |
|
27 |
+it cannot be reconciled with the First Amendment's protection of freedom of speech. |