| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,19 @@ |
|
1 |
+====Counterplan text: Public colleges and universities ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech except for speech regulated under the 1989 University of Wisconsin System speech rule and ought to adopt the 1989 University of Wisconsin System speech rule.==== |
|
2 |
+**U.S. District Court E.D. Wisconsin 91 clarifies** ~~United States District Court E.D. Wisconsin, a bunch of judges—probably pretty qualified, 10-11-1991, "UWM Post v. Board of Regents of University of Wisconsin", http://cdn.publicinterestnetwork.org/assets/mdGVXR4xIIPFiNRwRkQzyg/SPEECH-CODES-UWM-POST-V-REGENTS.pdf~~ AG |
|
3 |
+Thus, in order to be regulated under the UW Rule, a comment, |
|
4 |
+AND |
|
5 |
+some illustrations of situations where the UW Rule applies and does not apply: |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+====Mutually exclusive—the rule's unconstitutional.==== |
|
9 |
+**FIRE n.d.** ~~FIRE, no date, "State of the Law: Speech Codes", FIRE, https://www.thefire.org/in-court/state-of-the-law-speech-codes/~~ AG brackets in original |
|
10 |
+UWM Post v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin, 774 F |
|
11 |
+AND |
|
12 |
+to have little value and great costs, amounts to governmental thought control." |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+====No chilling—my evidence is specific.==== |
|
16 |
+**Hodulik 90** ~~PATRICIA HODULIK; B.A., 1972; J.D., 1976, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Senior System Legal Counsel, University of Wisconsin System Administration;1990-1991; "RACIST SPEECH ON CAMPUS"; Wayne Law Review; https://heinonline.org/HOL/Page?collection=journalsandhandle=hein.journals/waynlr37andtype=Textandid=1450~~ AG |
|
17 |
+In the eighteen months in which it has been in force, a total of |
|
18 |
+AND |
|
19 |
+effect" on speech from a narrowly applicable rule is minimal or nonexistent. |