Changes for page Brentwood Younger Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:34
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[35]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-10-15 23:27:47. 5951 +2016-10-15 23:27:47.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[36]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,20 @@ 1 +Interpretation: The affirmative must defend a post-fiat policy banning production of nuclear power. ‘Resolved’ denotes a proposal to be enacted by law. 2 +Words and Phrases 64 (Permanent Edition) 3 +Definition of the … establish by law”. 4 +And google defines prohibit: 5 +https://www.google.com/search?q=prohibitandoq=prohibitandaqs=chrome..69i57j69i60l3j69i59l2.1314j0j1andsourceid=chromeandie=UTF-8 6 +formally forbid (something) by law, rule, or other authority. 7 +Debate requires a specific point of difference in order to promote effective exchange. 8 +Steinberg and Freeley 13, * David, Lecturer in Communicatio22n studies and rhetoric. Advisor to Miami Urban Debate League. Director of Debate at U Miami, Former President of CEDA. And Austin, attorney who focuses on criminal, personal injury and civil rights law, JD, Suffolk University, Argumentation and Debate, Critical Thinking for Reasoned Decision Making, 121-4 9 +Debate is a … the following discussion. 10 +Debate inevitably involves exclusions – making sure that those exclusions occur along reciprocal lines is necessary to foster democratic habits and critical thinking – this process of intellectual exchange outweighs the aff. 11 +Amanda Anderson 6, prof of English at Johns Hopkins The Way We Argue Now, 25-8 12 +25 Whether such a … institutions and practices. 13 +Defending the topic is hard because it requires you to admit you could be wrong—that generates competitive respect and dialogue. Voting aff reinforces group polarization and choir preaching. Talisse 2005 – philosophy professor at Vanderbilt (Robert, Philosophy and Social Criticism, 31.4, “Deliberativist responses to activist challenges”) 14 +Nonetheless, the deliberativist … he is unreasonable. 15 +Topical fairness requirements are key to effective dialogue—monopolizing strategy and prep makes the discussion one-sided and subverts any meaningful neg role. 16 +Galloway 7 – professor of communications at Samford University (Ryan, “Dinner And Conversation At The Argumentative Table: Reconceptualizing Debate As An Argumentative Dialogue”, Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, Vol. 28 (2007), 17 +Debate as a … of topical advocacy 18 +Norms are a pre-requisite to argumentation. 19 +Goodnight: Predicaments of Communication, Argument, and Power: Towards a Critical Theory of Controversy G. THOMAS GOODNIGHT Vol 23, No 2 (2003) 20 +Interlocutors can engage … a practical discourse" (Habermas, 1990, 121; also 119-125). - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-15 23:27:48.32 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Chetan Hertzig, Terrence Lonam, Martin Sigalow - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Cypress Bay EN - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +15 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Triples - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Brentwood Younger Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Implementation T - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Bronx