Changes for page Brentwood Younger Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:34
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[5]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-09-16 20:46:39. 6561 +2016-09-16 20:46:39.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[11]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,3 @@ 1 +Interpretation: Debaters must disclose all positions on the 2015-2016 NDCA LD Wiki under their school and name. The disclosure must be consistent with the guidelines set by Mr. Timmons and Mr. Forslund in the tournament invitation – it’s literally a rule to compete at this tournament. 2 +Timmons and Forslund 16 (Aaron Timmons and Eric Forslund, Directors of Debate @ the Greenhill School, “Greenhill Tournament Invite,” 2016, https://www.tabroom.com/index/tourn/index.mhtml?tourn_id=5697) 3 +Case List (Applicable to both Policy Debate and Lincoln Douglas Debate) As mentioned in the opening letter, those attending the Greenhill Fall Classic are guests of Greenhill School and its coaching staff. While we value different pedagogical perspectives, at this event, we are unwavering in our perspective on the value of openness. Openness promotes comprehension and preparation, which are critical components for effective clash and better debates. As the host of an early season tournament, we feel particularly compelled to promote an environment that facilitates better debates for the students involved. As competitors for the rest of the season, we appreciate that competitive drives can run into conflict with openness. Finding the appropriate balance between the learning environment and the competitive environment deserves continued consideration. We have decided that a willingness to take part in a collective case list – in both spirit and in practice – is an essential characteristic to accepting the invitation to our event. Case lists enhance the pedagogical and competitive goals of openness by allowing students to better understanding their opponents’ arguments which is an essential component to quality clash and better debates. *If you cannot agree with the stipulation below, we respectfully ask that you explore other competitive opportunities on this weekend. Those that DO attend, yet attempt to evade/ignore our requests, will be asked to leave. Participation in the Greenhill Fall Classic, and its benefits like mutual preference judging, is a privilege, not a right.* It is also our belief that teams/debaters have an affirmative obligation to update the wiki as new arguments are run throughout the tournament. To clarify, this is a requirement/expectation to compete. For the last few years we experimented with a case list in Lincoln Douglas debate and after much reflection and improvement on the implementation of the details of submission, we will once again require all competitors to submit information to a case list available to all coaches and students in both policy and Lincoln Douglas Debate. It is the duty of coaches to inform students of the expectation of disclosure/the case list. Links to a Drop box are not acceptable. All information must be placed directly into the Wiki. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-09-16 20:46:42.792 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +any - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +5 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Brentwood Younger Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Greenhill Disclosure Theory - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Greenhill