Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[58]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[58]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,12 +1,0 @@
1		-Interpretation – The affirmative must only eliminate restrictions on constitutionally protected speech – they cannot fiat or gain offense from removing a speech regulation that’s constitutional. Constitutionally protected is limited by exceptions created by the Supreme Court – its protected unless there’s a specific exemption in play.
2		-Shapiro (Professor Shapiro, University of Mainz, "Freedom of Speech", https://home.ubalt.edu/shapiro/rights_course/Chapter4text.htm, 2001)
3		-IV. FREEDOM OF SPEECH … unconstitutional content-based distinctions.
4		-Violation – Lipson is about safe spaces, but student rights to safe spaces are constitutionally protected.
5		-Palumbo-Liu (David Palumbo-Liu, "Students Have A Legal Right To Safe Spaces", posted on Nov. 17, 2015, https://www.buzzfeed.com/davidpalumboliu/students-have-a-legal-right-to-safe-spaces?utm_term=.bkpzjJ5qq#.dop921xoo)
6		-Last week, several … for you, either.”
7		-Standards
8		-1. Field Context –
9		-2. Limits
10		-There are thousands of speech codes and policies that the aff can choose to overturn – destroying my ability to engage the aff.
11		-Lukianoff (Greg Lukianoff, "Campus Speech Codes: Absurd, Tenacious, and Everywhere", May 23, 2008 , https://www.nas.org/articles/Campus_Speech_Codes_Absurd_Tenacious_and_Everywhere)
12		-For our 2007 … and 2 green.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-12-18 23:59:26.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Nick Steele, Daniel Park, Steve Knell

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Immaculate Heard DD

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-27

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Octas

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Brentwood Younger Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-JANFEB - Constitutionally Protected T

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-CPS