| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,6 @@ |
|
1 |
+Their faith in deliberation - that we should ‘convince the racist’ - is grounded in color-blind paternalism. It places faith in white virtue and imposes a burden that results in antiblack violence. |
|
2 |
+Delgado and Yun ’94: (Richard Delgado and David H. Yun, Pressure Valves and Bloodied Chickens: An Analysis of Paternalistic Objections to Hate Speech Regulation, 82 Cal. L. Rev. 871 (1994)//FT) |
|
3 |
+Regulation, 82 Cal. L. Rev. 871 (1994) D. "More Speech"-Talking Back to … for educating others? |
|
4 |
+The alternative is to reject the constitution as an excuse for racism. The alt ruptures the myth of white virtue: they are not simply ignorant or looking to play ‘devil’s advocate.’ The alternative creates the platform necessary to define freedom and equality substantively not formally. |
|
5 |
+Matsuda 93 Mari Matsuda (Law Professor at the William S. Richardson School of Law at the University of Hawaii). “Words that Wound: Critical Race The- ory, Assaultive Speech, and the First Amendment.” Westview Press. 1993. HW. https://books.google.com/books/about/Words_that_Wound.html?id=Mllj8BuAlJYC |
|
6 |
+One of the … in the fields. |