| ... |
... |
@@ -1,17
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-Counterplan text: Public colleges and universities ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech except for hate speech. Lawrence bracketed is the solvency advocate |
| 2 |
|
-Charles R. Lawrence III, “Crossburning and the Sound of Silence: Antisubordination Theory and the First Amendment,” 1992, http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2784andcontext=vlr |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-But there is…masters and slaves. |
| 5 |
|
- |
| 6 |
|
-Competition: the counterplan competes both textually and functionally—you don’t restrict any speech, we restrict hate speech. |
| 7 |
|
- |
| 8 |
|
-Net Benefits: |
| 9 |
|
-Hate speech poses a direct threat to the oppressed. Banning it is necessary to promote inclusiveness. |
| 10 |
|
-Jared Taylor summarizes Waldron, 12, Why We Should Ban “Hate Speech”, American Renaissance, summarizing Jeremy Waldron, The Harm in Hate Speech, Harvard University Press, 2012, 292 pp., 26.95. 8/24/12, http://www.amren.com/features/2012/08/why-we-should-ban-hate-speech/ **Note – Taylor does not agree with but is summarizing Waldron’s position |
| 11 |
|
- |
| 12 |
|
-First-Amendment guarantees …drive out minorities. |
| 13 |
|
- |
| 14 |
|
-Courts check—things like context solves for crowding out speech that’s productive to solve structural violence |
| 15 |
|
-Arthur 11 (Joyce, Founder and Executive Director of the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada, a national political pro-choice group, “The Limits of Free Speech,” Sep 21, 2011, https://rewire.news/article/2011/09/21/limits-free-speech-5/ //) |
| 16 |
|
- |
| 17 |
|
-A common…that critiques it. |