| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,17 @@ |
|
1 |
+Counterplan text: Public colleges and universities ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech except for hate speech. Lawrence bracketed is the solvency advocate |
|
2 |
+Charles R. Lawrence III, “Crossburning and the Sound of Silence: Antisubordination Theory and the First Amendment,” 1992, http://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2784andcontext=vlr |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+But there is…masters and slaves. |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+Competition: the counterplan competes both textually and functionally—you don’t restrict any speech, we restrict hate speech. |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+Net Benefits: |
|
9 |
+Hate speech poses a direct threat to the oppressed. Banning it is necessary to promote inclusiveness. |
|
10 |
+Jared Taylor summarizes Waldron, 12, Why We Should Ban “Hate Speech”, American Renaissance, summarizing Jeremy Waldron, The Harm in Hate Speech, Harvard University Press, 2012, 292 pp., 26.95. 8/24/12, http://www.amren.com/features/2012/08/why-we-should-ban-hate-speech/ **Note – Taylor does not agree with but is summarizing Waldron’s position |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+First-Amendment guarantees …drive out minorities. |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+Courts check—things like context solves for crowding out speech that’s productive to solve structural violence |
|
15 |
+Arthur 11 (Joyce, Founder and Executive Director of the Abortion Rights Coalition of Canada, a national political pro-choice group, “The Limits of Free Speech,” Sep 21, 2011, https://rewire.news/article/2011/09/21/limits-free-speech-5/ //) |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+A common…that critiques it. |