| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,20 @@ |
|
1 |
+Qualified immunity facilitates the evolution of rights- successful suits cause courts to restrict rights. Pittman 12. |
|
2 |
+Nathan R. Pittman, JD Candidate, 2012, “Unintentional Levels of Force in § 1983 Excessive Force Claims,” William and Mary Law Review, May, 53 Wm. and Mary L. Rev. 2107, p. 2128 |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+Another criticism leveled...of current law. |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+Qualified immunity necessary to encourage constitutional innovation. |
|
7 |
+Jeffries 99 |
|
8 |
+John C. Jeffries, Jr., Law Professor, University of Virginia, 1999, “The Right-Remedy Gap in Constitutional Law,” Yale Law Journal, 109 Yale L. J. 87, p. 104-5 |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+In itself, the...and future right. |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+Qualified immunity cases are key. Jeffries 99. |
|
13 |
+John C. Jeffries, Jr., Law Professor, University of Virginia, 1999, “The Right-Remedy Gap in Constitutional Law,” Yale Law Journal, 109 Yale L. J. 87, p. 104-5 |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+For present purposes...of constitutional change. |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+Ending QI would kill movements for racial equality – We wouldn’t have school desegregation if damages were possible. Jeffries 99. |
|
18 |
+John C. Jeffries, Jr., Law Professor, University of Virginia, 1999, “The Right-Remedy Gap in Constitutional Law,” Yale Law Journal, 109 Yale L. J. 87, p. 104-5 |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+I know of...come out differently. |