Changes for page Brentwood Raphaelson Neg
Summary
-
Objects (2 modified, 2 added, 7 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[22]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-02-05 18:5 3:49.01 +2017-02-05 18:52:37.574
- Caselist.CitesClass[23]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,14 +1,0 @@ 1 -I value morality. 2 -To value any end, I must value the conditions necessary to will that end – independence is one of those conditions, since end-setting requires I be free from another’s control. Willing means I hold myself to be able to fulfill that end, which requires freedom. There can be no objection to deny another’s freedom since they possess the same right and that would deny my worth – resolving disputes via unilateral coercion is a contradiction. 3 -Korsgaard: Christine M. Korsgaard “Taking the Law into Our Own Hands: Kant on the Right to Revolution” Oxford University Press. 2008 4 -Suppose we are…some lawful way. 5 - 6 -Thus we must have an omnilateral will since it’s a contradiction by willing a world where the will is denied or clashing without resolution. All claims are provisional until brought under public right – only reciprocal coercion is consistent with freedom. 7 -Korsgaard 2: Christine M. Korsgaard “Taking the Law into Our Own Hands: Kant on the Right to Revolution” Oxford University Press. 2008 8 -Now, with respect..a civil constitution. (MPJ 6:256) 9 - 10 -The government can limit private speech – nuisances are a violation of the state’s obligation to provide public spaces. 11 -Ripstein 09 Arthur Ripstein, “Force and Freedom”. Harvard University Press, 2009 //BWSWJ 12 -Blocking a road…use public spaces. 13 - 14 -Thus the standard is consistency with the omnilateral will. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-05 18:53:50.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Donald Fagan - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Oakwood Secondary School - North Hollywood AO - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -16 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Brentwood Raphaelson Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JAN FEB- Kant NC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Golden Desert
- Caselist.CitesClass[24]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -some of the cases in this wiki deal may deal with issues of rape, revenge porn, suicide, ect. Please email me or facebook me if these positions are at all triggering ! I'm happy to change my strat to make it a better round:) - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-05 19:02:28.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -any - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -17 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Brentwood Raphaelson Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1- TRIGGER WARNING - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -any
- Caselist.CitesClass[26]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,6 +1,0 @@ 1 -The affirmative may only garner offense from topical arguments. 2 - 3 -preempts: 4 --perms spike 5 --aff must defend removing restrictions on revenge porn 6 --the neg may specify a speech category to restrict and protect other constitutionally-protected free speech if the neg has a solvency advocate that defends a restriction should be placed on some constitutionally protected speech. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-19 06:23:52.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -any - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -19 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Semis - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Brentwood Raphaelson Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1- Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -lots of em
- Caselist.CitesClass[27]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,25 +1,0 @@ 1 -“Public colleges and universities in the United States ought to expand the view of sexual violence violations to include revenge pornography as harassment and restrict it accordingly.” To clarify, public colleges and universities ought not restrict any constitutionally protected speech except revenge porn. Rennison and Addington 14 is the solvency advocate: 2 -Callie Rennison (associate professor in the School of Public Affairs at the University of Colorado Denver) and Lynn Addington (associate professor in the Department of Justice, Law and Criminology, School of Public Affairs at American University in Washington, DC), “Violence Against College Women: A Review to Identify Limitations in Defining the Problem and Inform Future Research” Trauma, Violence, and Abuse. July 2014. Vol. 15, no. 3. Pgs. 159-169. http://tva.sagepub.com/content/15/3/159.full#sec-11 SF 3 - 4 -The current violence…significant emotional harm). 5 -The counterplan competes through mutual exclusivity; the aff defends all constitutionally protected speech and revenge pornography is federally protected under the first amendment. 6 -ACLU v. Arizona gives the best precedent. Harrison 15: 7 -Anne Harrison (Student Writer for the Journal of Gender, Race and Justice), “Revenge Porn: Protected by the Constitution?” The Journal of Gender, Race and Justice. Vol 18. February 2015. https://jgrj.law.uiowa.edu/article/revenge-porn-protected-constitution SF 8 - 9 -Because the anti…, and historical images.” 10 -Revenge porn is the Internet evolution of stalking and begets real stalking. It is constitutively psychological harassment. Robertson 15: 11 -Hope Robertson (3L student at Campbell Law School), “The Criminalization of Revenge Porn” Campbell Law Observer. July 21, 2015. http://campbelllawobserver.com/the-criminalization-of-revenge-porn/ SF 12 - 13 -With the advancement..on the websites. 14 -Revenge Pornography is inherently sexist – there is no debate. Filipovic 13: 15 -Jill Filipovic (Journalist) “’Revenge Porn’ Is About Degrading Women Sexually and Professionally.” The Guardian, 2013. Accessed 11/10/14. http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/jan/28/revenge-porn-degrades-women SF 16 - 17 -Society sees it…and harming them. 18 -Don’t let them say free speech good; discursive objectification of women on college campuses takes away their speech. Turns case. Pinar 12: 19 -William F. Pinar (American educator, curriculum theorist and international studies scholar; has taught at LSU, Colgate, Columbia, and Ohio State), “The Gender of Violence on Campus” Published in Gendered Futures in Higher Education: Critical Perspectives for Change. Edited by Becky Ropers-Huilman. Feb 1, 2012. SUNY Press SF 20 - 21 -The culture of…more stupid questions. 22 - 23 -Women speech on sexual violence is silenced through a false dualism of private and public spheres. A safe internet is a radical counter public where the violence faced by women can be heard and responded to – leads to larger societal spillover. Salter 13: 24 -Michael Salter (lecturer in criminology at the university of western sydney), “Justice and revenge in online counter-publics: Emerging responses to sexual violence in the age of social media.” July 11, 2013. SAGE Journals. http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1741659013493918 SF 25 -In liberal democracies… networks and activists. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-19 06:26:18.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Ashan Peris - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harvard Westlake AM - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -20 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Brentwood Raphaelson Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JANFEB- Revenge Porn PIC v2 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Golden Desert
- Caselist.RoundClass[16]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -22,23 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-02-05 18:5 3:47.01 +2017-02-05 18:52:35.0
- Caselist.RoundClass[17]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -24 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-05 19:02:25.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -any - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Finals - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -any
- Caselist.RoundClass[19]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -26 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-19 06:23:50.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -any - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Semis - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -lots of em
- Caselist.RoundClass[20]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -27 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-02-19 06:26:15.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Ashan Peris - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Harvard Westlake AM - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -6 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Golden Desert
- Caselist.CitesClass[21]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +The affirmative may only garner offense from topical arguments. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-04 21:35:34.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +any - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +15 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Semis - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Brentwood Raphaelson Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1- Interps - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +lots of em
- Caselist.RoundClass[15]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +21 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-04 21:35:31.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +any - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Semis - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +lots of em