Changes for page Brentwood Raphaelson Neg
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 3 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[16]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +22,23 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-02-05 18:5 2:35.6601 +2017-02-05 18:53:47.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[22]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,19 @@ 1 +The affs approach to answering the question of “ought” presumes access that the black thinker does not have – The world is framed by white supremacy, and black ethical deliberation is censored in favor of abstract white philosophy. 2 +Curry ’13, (Curry, Tommy J. doctor in Associate Professor of Philosophy, Affiliated Professor of Africana Studies, Texas A and M University In the Fiat of Dreams: The Delusional Allure of Hope, the Reality of Anti-Black Violence and the Demands of the Anti-Ethical. 2013.//FT) 3 +Ought implies a…idea of ethics. 4 +The black thinker cannot ought to do something under a veil of morality given to use by the world framed by white supremacy. Morality is contingent upon black demise, so when we say we value morality, we are valuing a system of morality constituted by European anthropology that needs black death in order to survive. 5 +Their starting point cannot include our concerns. Ideal theory is a tool of exclusion by white academia. 6 +Mills: Mills, Charles Caribbean philosopher from Jamaica. He is known for his work in social and political philosophy, particularly in oppositional political theory as centered on class, gender, and race “Ideal Theory as Ideology” Hypatia, Volume 20 (Number 3). Summer 2005. FT 7 +Finally, consider the …the status quo. 8 + 9 +The alternative is an anti-ethical paradigm - this situates normativity on a focus towards material lived experiences - vote neg to reject the colorblind mindset of the 1AC that only re-entrenches domination. 10 + Dr. Tommy J. Curry 13, Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Texas AandM, "In the Fiat of Dreams: The Delusional Allure of Hope, the Reality of Anti-Black Violence and the Demands of the Anti-Ethical", 2013 FT 11 +Anti-ethics; the …nigger-souls, is totalizing. 12 + 13 +The role of the ballot is to vote for the debate who best discursively and methodologically challenges oppression. Each decision made by both debaters and judges matter – they perpetuate the exclusionary nature of debate – accessibility is a multiplier for all other impacts __ 14 +Smith ’13: (Elijah Smith. “A Conversation in Ruins: Race and Black Participation in Lincoln Douglas Debate.” Vbriefly. September 6, 2013//FT) 15 +At every tournament …students cannot escape. 16 + 17 +Performance is not just the aff’s post fiat policy – but the principle by which they engage the resolution. 18 +Vincent 2K13 Vincent, Christopher ’13 Re-Conceptualizing our Performances: Accountability in Lincoln Douglas Debate. Graduate Assistant for the University of Louisville Debate Team and Director of Debate at the James Graham Brown School in Louisville, KY. 19 +As a community …in those moments. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-05 18:53:49.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Donald Fagan - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Secondary School - North Hollywood AO - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +16 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Brentwood Raphaelson Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1- Ideal Theory K - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Golden Desert
- Caselist.CitesClass[23]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,14 @@ 1 +I value morality. 2 +To value any end, I must value the conditions necessary to will that end – independence is one of those conditions, since end-setting requires I be free from another’s control. Willing means I hold myself to be able to fulfill that end, which requires freedom. There can be no objection to deny another’s freedom since they possess the same right and that would deny my worth – resolving disputes via unilateral coercion is a contradiction. 3 +Korsgaard: Christine M. Korsgaard “Taking the Law into Our Own Hands: Kant on the Right to Revolution” Oxford University Press. 2008 4 +Suppose we are…some lawful way. 5 + 6 +Thus we must have an omnilateral will since it’s a contradiction by willing a world where the will is denied or clashing without resolution. All claims are provisional until brought under public right – only reciprocal coercion is consistent with freedom. 7 +Korsgaard 2: Christine M. Korsgaard “Taking the Law into Our Own Hands: Kant on the Right to Revolution” Oxford University Press. 2008 8 +Now, with respect..a civil constitution. (MPJ 6:256) 9 + 10 +The government can limit private speech – nuisances are a violation of the state’s obligation to provide public spaces. 11 +Ripstein 09 Arthur Ripstein, “Force and Freedom”. Harvard University Press, 2009 //BWSWJ 12 +Blocking a road…use public spaces. 13 + 14 +Thus the standard is consistency with the omnilateral will. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-05 18:53:50.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Donald Fagan - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Oakwood Secondary School - North Hollywood AO - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +16 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Brentwood Raphaelson Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JAN FEB- Kant NC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Golden Desert
- Caselist.RoundClass[17]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-05 19:02:25.683 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +any - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +any - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +any