| ... |
... |
@@ -2,29
+2,25 @@ |
| 2 |
2 |
|
| 3 |
3 |
Brackets for clarity, efficiency, and potentially offensive language. |
| 4 |
4 |
|
| 5 |
|
-Status quo education kills educational value and critical thinking. Freire |
| 6 |
|
-“Pedagogy of the Oppressed;” |
| 7 |
|
-"A careful analysis ... teachers and students." |
| 8 |
|
- |
|
5 |
+The role of the ballot is Minimizing Structural Barriers, defined as alleviating the material conditions that commit structural violence on marginalized groups. Prefer |
| 9 |
9 |
|
| 10 |
|
-This means that the judge needs to take a critical position to allow for debate about shaping conditions to revitalize political agency. Giroux ’03 |
| 11 |
|
-Giroux 03 Henry Giroux (Chair Professorship of Edcuation and Cultural Studies at Penn State). “The Abandoned Generation: Democracy Beyond the Culture of Fear.” Chapter 14: THE URBAN DEBATE LEAGUE AND THE POLITICS OF POSSIBILITY. Palgrave Macmillan, 2003 |
| 12 |
|
-"Educators at all .. reason for hope." |
|
7 |
+Focusing on which ethical or philosophical ideology is best makes applicable discussion impossible, and causes debate to divorce itself from empirical realities. Instead we must ground our analysis of the resolution in real-world struggles that plague society. Curry. |
|
8 |
+Dr. Tommy J. Curry 14, “The Cost of a Thing: A Kingian Reformulation of a Living Wage Argument in the 21st Century”, Victory Briefs, 2014 |
|
9 |
+"Despite the pronouncement... seek to address." |
| 13 |
13 |
|
| 14 |
|
-The Role of the Ballot is Minimizing Structural Barriers by working within the state. Debaters link back by comparing advocacies to provide remedies to the oppressed. Society imposes a double bind on an oppressed person – either they succumb to the system and continue to be oppressed or fight back and suffer repercussions. The solution is to engage structural oppression through state engagement. |
|
11 |
+This turns and outweighs kritik alternatives. Abstraction divorces us from reality, destroying critical advocacy skills and tools we need to resist oppression. It also allows the problems that we criticize to be perpetuated as we ignore material conditions and constantly debate about high theory. |
| 15 |
15 |
|
| 16 |
|
-Intimate partner violence is uniquely bad because it magnifies all type of oppression – preventing IPV is a key first step to fighting other types of oppression. |
| 17 |
|
-Thom ‘15 Kai Cheng Thom essayist on identity, sexuality, gender, intersectional feminism, mental health, and activism “5 Common Ways Our Communities Fail to Address Intimate Partner Violence” September 10, 2015. Everyday Feminism. http://everydayfeminism.com/2015/09/how-we-fail-address-ipv/ |
| 18 |
|
-"There is no ... to say, collectively." |
|
13 |
+2. Ethical theories that aren’t grounded in the current social context fail to analyze structural inequalities and real world issues. Mills bracketed. |
|
14 |
+Mills, C. W. (2009), Rawls on Race/Race in Rawls. The Southern Journal of Philosophy, 47: 161–184 |
|
15 |
+"Now how can...ever did arrive." |
| 19 |
19 |
|
| 20 |
|
-Prefer my framework: |
|
17 |
+This means the case comes before k alts – before we can have an ideal forum to talk about discourse and representations we need to solve for the disparities and oppression in the world. |
| 21 |
21 |
|
| 22 |
|
-1) all moral theories presume the basic worth of persons as grounds for limiting the way we treat others, otherwise there would be no reason to constrain our actions against people or give everyone considerations in our moral calculi. Oppression breaches this assumption by treating subjects as less than human and as tools in the pursuit of social or ideological goods. |
|
19 |
+3. We need to create systems that focus on strategies to stop oppression and make our ethical categorizing meaningful – otherwise people are arbitrarily excluded. Winter and Leighton. |
|
20 |
+Deborah DuNann Winter and Dana C. Leighton. Winter: Psychologist that specializes in Social Psych, Counseling Psych, Historical and Contemporary Issues, Peace Psychology. Leighton: PhD graduate student in the Psychology Department at the University of Arkansas. Knowledgable in the fields of social psychology, peace psychology, and ustice and intergroup responses to transgressions of justice) (Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology in the 21st century. Pg 4-5) |
|
21 |
+"Finally, to recognize...to reduce it." |
| 23 |
23 |
|
| 24 |
|
-2) oppression destroys an individuals ability to act morally. Oppression prevents the realization of full moral agency and personhood by denying that people have value. Those subject to oppressive state policies are denied the range of autonomy needed to shape their identity as moral actors, and can ingrain the oppressive mindsets imposed on them. |
| 25 |
25 |
|
| 26 |
|
-3) Epistemology – we can only access knowledge once we understand and criticize the power structures that inform it. Bleiker Discourse and Human Agency Roland Bleiker1 School of Political Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QID 4072, Australia. E-mail: bleiker@mailbox.ug.edu.an Contemporary Political Theory, 2003, 2, (25–47) r 2003 Palgrave Macmillan Ltd 1470-8914/03 $15.00 |
| 27 |
|
-"‘It is within ... thereby becomes improbable.’" |
| 28 |
28 |
|
| 29 |
29 |
CONTENTION 1: IS THE HARMS |
| 30 |
30 |
|
| ... |
... |
@@ -67,6
+67,18 @@ |
| 67 |
67 |
|
| 68 |
68 |
CONTENTION 3 IS FRAMING |
| 69 |
69 |
|
| 70 |
|
-I recognize that IPV is an intersectional issue that affects everyone, including people who identify with any group, gender, sexuality, race, etc. While most of the literature focuses on IPV survivors who identify as women, I account for this in my speech act and am inclusive of everyone. However, even if I am not able to fully represent everyone in my speech, it is better to start a dialogue of resistance that we can build on – IPV is something that must be discussed to start change. |
| 71 |
|
-Thom 2 Kai Cheng Thom essayist on identity, sexuality, gender, intersectional feminism, mental health, and activism “5 Common Ways Our Communities Fail to Address Intimate Partner Violence” September 10, 2015. Everyday Feminism. http://everydayfeminism.com/2015/09/how-we-fail-address-ipv/ |
| 72 |
|
-"And we need ... communities to speak." |
|
66 |
+Engaging in critical discussion of IPV in our culture is key to actively creating change. Chawla. |
|
67 |
+Tarang Chawla University of Melbourne “How we talk about domestic violence needs to change” Medium. March 26, 2015. RY |
|
68 |
+"Current conversation on...about IPV domestic violence." |
|
69 |
+ |
|
70 |
+ I recognize that IPV is an intersectional issue that affects all races, including but not limited to women, the LGBTQ+ community, and even men. The problem is that a vast majority of IPV targets are women which informs literature discussion. Vainik. |
|
71 |
+Citation: 91 Minn. L. Rev. 1113 2006-2007 Kiss, Kiss, Bang, Bang: How CurrentApproaches to Guns and Domestic Violence Fail to Save Women's Lives JenniferL. Vainik |
|
72 |
+ |
|
73 |
+"While the term...of their children." |
|
74 |
+ |
|
75 |
+This has multiple implications: |
|
76 |
+a. No link to intersectionality or male victimization – the AC would prevent all officers in any cases involving IPV from receiving qualified immunity. Implementation of the AC is intersectional, recognizing there are many possible instances of partner violence and I account for any literature bias in my speech act. |
|
77 |
+ |
|
78 |
+b. It’s comparatively better to have the AC’s discussion with evidence focusing on women then no discussion at all. Since the literature heavily focuses on harms to women, we couldn’t have a partner violence aff on this topic at all without this framing. This outweighs their kritik on severity – even if I do not fully represent every voice it’s better to at least start the discussion and give them a chance to be heard rather than perpetuating silence on partner violence. |
|
79 |
+ |
|
80 |
+Underviews |