| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,31 @@ |
|
1 |
+A criticism of hyper masculinity is a criticism of autism itself. The extreme male brain theory of autism explains autism as an extreme exaggeration of neurological masculinity, or the extreme male brain, due to increased fetal testosterone. People with autism often behave and act in ways that would be considered hyper masculinity, with a focus on obsessions and systemizations over empathetic concerns. To criticize hyper masculinity is to criticize people with autism like me/one of my teammates. Baron-Cohen |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+It has also...a similar pattern. |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+And it’s not just autism, ADHD is also highly correlated with hyper masculinity, to say that hyper masculinity is bad is to say that people with ADHD are bad McFadden et al. |
|
6 |
+Attention-deficit/hyperactivity...a single disorder.
|
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+Disability comes first – it’s a master trope to uncovering other forms of oppression. Siebers |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+Oppression is the...justifiable human inferiority. |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+The alternative is to engage in vulnerability analysis to understand the structural and state oppression exerted onto the disabled body. Campbell alt |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+The presentation of...for judicial determination” (2008, 21). |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+This takes out the permutation – we need to examine the state and its institutions before we can use it. The perm guts the solvency of the alt by forcing us to use the flawed state – which will perpetuate oppression. |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+And indicts to the alt don’t matter – as long as we accept he possibility of the disabled subject in society ableist logic will collapse. Volder 01 : |
|
21 |
+Disability studies teaches...of mutual desire. |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+And resisting ableism is an ethical imperative for academics. Campbell |
|
24 |
+The ruminations of...a space of resistance’. |
|
25 |
+ |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+Moreover, examining discourse is necessary to uncover and challenge systems of power. This precludes all other impacts, we can only approach knowledge once we untangle it from regimes of power. Bleiker writes |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+‘It is within...thereby becomes improbable.’ |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+Underview – Delay, Severance and intrinsicness perms are voting issues, they explode aff ground by granting the 1AR access to an infinite number of policy options and kill stable advocacy by letting the aff kick out of all links to disadvantages. Ground is key to fairness because equal access to offense determines access to the ballot. Stable advocacy is key to fairness because I can’t engage his arguments if he keeps changing them. Fairness is a voter- it’s constitutive of any competitive activity and drop the debater- the only way to compensate from the time skew of devastating short arguments is a loss. |