| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,12 @@ |
|
1 |
+QUALIFIED IMMUNITY FACILITATES THE EVOLUTION OF RIGHTS – SUCCESSFUL SUITS CAUSE COURTS TO RESTRICT RIGHTS |
|
2 |
+Nathan R. Pittman, JD Candidate, 2012, “Unintentional Levels of Force in § 1983 Excessive Force Claims,” William and Mary Law Review, May, 53 Wm. and Mary L. Rev. 2107, p. 2128 |
|
3 |
+Another criticism leveled...of current law. |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+QUALIFIED IMMUNITY is necessary to encourage constitutional innovation and expand rights protections across society |
|
6 |
+Jeffries 99, John C. Jeffries, Jr., Law Professor, University of Virginia, 1999, “The Right-Remedy Gap in Constitutional Law,” Yale Law Journal, 109 Yale L. J. 87, p. 104-5 |
|
7 |
+In itself, the...and future right. |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+Ending QI would kill movements for racial equality – We wouldn’t have school desegregation if damages were possible |
|
11 |
+Jeffries 99, John C. Jeffries, Jr., Law Professor, University of Virginia, 1999, “The Right-Remedy Gap in Constitutional Law,” Yale Law Journal, 109 Yale L. J. 87, p. 104-5 |
|
12 |
+I know of...come out differently. |