| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,9 @@ |
|
1 |
+The affirmative is an attempt by the state to appease indigenous people while willfully ignoring that the state’s existence is contingent on colonialist domination. The kritik is not a question of mutual exclusivity, but one of priorities. Failing to address colonialist expansion on indigenous lands as a FIRST PRIORITY ensures further imperialist domination kills solvency and turns case. (Professor of Ethnic Studies at University of Colorado, Boulder, BA and MA in Communications from Sangamon State, From A Native Son pgs 520 – 530) |
|
2 |
+"I’ll debunk some ... order on non-Indians." |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+Positing the law as a savior of indigenous Americans willfully ignores the brutal colonialist relationship between it and Native Americans. Calling on the law to help them while ignoring the legacy of colonialism paints Native Americans as helpless and in need of white salvation. (J.D. Harvard Law School, Professor University of Arizona's James E. Rogers College of the Law, serving as the E. Thomas Sullivan Professor of Law and American Indian Studies and Director of the Indigenous Peoples Law and Policy Program. (Robert A. Jr.* “‘THE PEOPLE OF THE STATES WHERE THEY ARE FOUND ARE OFTEN THEIR DEADLIEST ENEMIES’: THE INDIAN SIDE OF THE STORY OF INDIAN RIGHTS AND FEDERALISM” Citation: 38 Ariz. L. Rev. 981 1996, accessed via Hein Online) |
|
5 |
+"The question which ... on attaining it?" |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+Environmental destruction of Native lands is inevitable without control of title to land.Jacques 3 – et al – Ph.D. University of Central Florida—AND—SHARON RIDGEWAY—Ph.D. Grinnell College and the University of Iowa—AND—RICHARD WITMER—Ph.D. Grinnell College. (Peter Federal Indian Law and Environmental Policy: A Social Continuity of Violence, 18 J. Envtl. L. and Litig. 223) |
|
9 |
+"Currently, federal Indian ... end to institutionalized." |