| ... |
... |
@@ -1,20
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-A. Counterplan Text: Colleges and Universities ought to allow all constitutionally protected speech in student publications except for hate speech |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
-B. Competition: CP competes via mutual exclusivity – I limit hate speech but the aff allows all speech in publications |
| 4 |
|
- |
| 5 |
|
-C. Net Benefits: |
| 6 |
|
-Publications are a source of hate on campus – it’s been used to promote platforms for hating, like holocaust denial. |
| 7 |
|
-Foxman ‘10 (Abraham H. Foxman National Director Anti-Defamation League, Fighting Holocaust Denial in Campus Newspaper Advertisements A Manual for Action Revised: May 2010) |
| 8 |
|
-"Holocaust denial is ... in this effort." |
| 9 |
|
- |
| 10 |
|
-Hate speech leads to a genocidal increase in crimes against marginalized groups. |
| 11 |
|
-Greenblatt ‘15 Jonathan Greenblatt, When Hateful Speech Leads to Hate Crimes: Taking Bigotry Out of the Immigration Debate, Huffington Post, 8/21/15, http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jonathan-greenblatt/when-hateful-speech-leads_b_8022966.html //LADI |
| 12 |
|
-"When police arrived ... the ball rolling." |
| 13 |
|
- |
| 14 |
|
-Hate speech chills campus behavior – this turns her civic engagement impact!! |
| 15 |
|
-Tsesis ‘10 (Tsesis, Alexander. "Burning Crosses On Campus: University Hate Speech Codes." Connecticut Law Review 617. 2010. Web. December 05, 2016. http://lawecommons.luc.edu/facpubs/131/.) |
| 16 |
|
-"Allowing students or ... or instigate violence." |
| 17 |
|
- |
| 18 |
|
- |
| 19 |
|
-Underview |
| 20 |
|
-Delay, Severance and intrinsicness perms are voting issues, they explode aff ground by granting the 1AR access to an infinite number of policy options and kill stable advocacy by letting the aff kick out of all links to disadvantages. Ground is key to fairness because equal access to offense determines access to the ballot. Stable advocacy is key to fairness because I can’t engage their arguments if they keeps changing them. Cross apply the voter from the T |