| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,12 @@ |
|
1 |
+A. Interpretation: The affirmative must only eliminate restrictions on constitutionally protected speech – they cannot fiat or gain offense from removing a speech regulation that’s constitutional. Constitutionally protected speech is limited by exceptions created by the Supreme Court – its protected unless there’s a specific exemption in play. |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+B. Violation: |
|
4 |
+SMU Law Library (http://library.law.smu.edu/Collections/Ellen-K~-~-Solender-Institute/Case-Summaries/Hosty-v~-~-Carter) |
|
5 |
+"Student journalists of ... in the case." |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+C. Standards: |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+1) Field Context |
|
10 |
+2) Limits |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+paradigm issues |