| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,14 @@ |
|
1 |
+The affs approach to answering the question of “ought” presumes access that the black thinker does not have – The world is framed by white supremacy, and black ethical deliberation is censored in favor of abstract white philosophy. |
|
2 |
+Curry ’13, (Curry, Tommy J. doctor in Associate Professor of Philosophy, Affiliated Professor of Africana Studies, Texas A and M University In the Fiat of Dreams: The Delusional Allure of Hope, the Reality of Anti-Black Violence and the Demands of the Anti-Ethical. 2013.//FT) |
|
3 |
+"Ought implies a ... idea of ethics." |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+The black thinker cannot ought to do something under a veil of morality given to use by the world framed by white supremacy. Morality is contingent upon black demise, so when we say we value morality, we are valuing a system of morality constituted by European anthropology that needs black death in order to survive. |
|
6 |
+Their starting point cannot include our concerns. Ideal theory is a tool of exclusion by white academia. |
|
7 |
+Mills: Mills, Charles Caribbean philosopher from Jamaica. He is known for his work in social and political philosophy, particularly in oppositional political theory as centered on class, gender, and race “Ideal Theory as Ideology” Hypatia, Volume 20 (Number 3). Summer 2005. FT |
|
8 |
+"Finally, consider the ... the status quo." |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+The alternative is an anti-ethical paradigm - this situates normativity on a focus towards material lived experiences - vote neg to reject the colorblind mindset of the 1AC that only re-entrenches domination. |
|
11 |
+ Dr. Tommy J. Curry 13, Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Texas AandM, "In the Fiat of Dreams: The Delusional Allure of Hope, the Reality of Anti-Black Violence and the Demands of the Anti-Ethical", 2013 FT |
|
12 |
+"Anti-ethics; the ... nigger-souls, is totalizing." |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+The role of the ballot is to vote for the debate who best discursively and methodologically challenges oppression. Each decision made by both debaters and judges matter – they perpetuate the exclusionary nature of debate – accessibility is a multiplier for all other impacts __ |