| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,25 @@ |
|
1 |
+A. Interpretation: |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+According to dictionary.com to limit means |
|
4 |
+to restrict by or as if by establishing limits (usually followed by to): |
|
5 |
+http://www.dictionary.com/browse/limit |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+That refers only to a total prohibition, not any action that has the consequence of decreasing the applicability of qualified immunity |
|
8 |
+Caiaccio 94 (Kevin T., “Are Noncompetition Covenants Among Law Partners Against Public Policy?”, Georgia Law Review, Spring, 28 Ga. L. Rev. 807, Lexis) |
|
9 |
+"The Howard court ... equal a prohibition. 143" |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+C. Standards: |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+1) Accuracy: |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+Merrel and Graham Merrell, Brandon, and Todd Graham. "Back to its Roots: Accuracy as the Litmus Test for Topicality." http://www.brandonmerrell.com/papers/Merrell20-20Topicality.pdf //BWSWJ |
|
17 |
+"Topicality is now ... quality of debate." |
|
18 |
+ |
|
19 |
+2) Prep Skew |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+D. Voter - Fairness |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+competing interps |
|
24 |
+ |
|
25 |
+Also, theory is not an RVI because |