| ... |
... |
@@ -1,15
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-===Contention – Blackmail=== |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
- |
| 4 |
|
-====Blackmail stops the exercise of freedom – it should be banned.==== |
| 5 |
|
-**Varden:** Helga Varden ~~Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Illinois~~ "A Kantian Conception of Free Speech" Springer. 2010 //BWSWJ |
| 6 |
|
-Finally, why is blackmail a matter of public right?17 As we have |
| 7 |
|
-AND |
| 8 |
|
-It is a public crime, since it endangers public right as such. |
| 9 |
|
- |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-====Blackmail is free speech – its not a violation of the first amendment==== |
| 12 |
|
-**Block and Gordon 85** ~~Walter Block and David Gordon, Blackmail, Extortion and Free Speech: A Reply to Posner, Epstein, Nozick and Lindgren, 19 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 37 (1985). Available at: h p://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol19/iss1/4 //BWSWJ~~~~ |
| 13 |
|
-As defined, blackmail should not be accorded the legal sanctions usually meted out in |
| 14 |
|
-AND |
| 15 |
|
-, to threaten to do X. Blackmail is thus a noncriminal act. |