Changes for page Brentwood Jackson Neg
Summary
-
Objects (2 modified, 18 added, 1 removed)
- Caselist.CitesClass[45]
- Caselist.CitesClass[70]
- Caselist.RoundClass[61]
- Caselist.CitesClass[71]
- Caselist.CitesClass[72]
- Caselist.CitesClass[73]
- Caselist.CitesClass[74]
- Caselist.CitesClass[77]
- Caselist.CitesClass[78]
- Caselist.CitesClass[79]
- Caselist.RoundClass[62]
- Caselist.RoundClass[63]
- Caselist.RoundClass[64]
- Caselist.RoundClass[66]
- Caselist.RoundClass[67]
- Caselist.RoundClass[68]
- Caselist.RoundClass[69]
- Caselist.RoundClass[70]
- Caselist.RoundClass[71]
- Caselist.RoundClass[72]
- Caselist.RoundClass[73]
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[45]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Interpretation: Debaters' disclosure must include a listing of the labels of all positions they have read directly on the wiki page, and may not only post speech docs without a general description of the arguments within. To clarify, you can't just throw up a document on the wiki, if you disclose a warming DA, you must add a listing saying "Warming DA" or similarly descriptive entry title. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-10-05 02:18:20.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -39 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Brentwood Jackson Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - DISCLOSE YOUR ARGS NOT JUST DOC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -x
- Caselist.CitesClass[70]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2017-02-18 21:21:44. 7221 +2017-02-18 21:21:44.0
- Caselist.RoundClass[61]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +70,71
- Caselist.CitesClass[71]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,15 @@ 1 +===Contention – Blackmail=== 2 + 3 + 4 +====Blackmail stops the exercise of freedom – it should be banned.==== 5 +**Varden:** Helga Varden ~~Associate Professor of Philosophy, University of Illinois~~ "A Kantian Conception of Free Speech" Springer. 2010 //BWSWJ 6 +Finally, why is blackmail a matter of public right?17 As we have 7 +AND 8 +It is a public crime, since it endangers public right as such. 9 + 10 + 11 +====Blackmail is free speech – its not a violation of the first amendment==== 12 +**Block and Gordon 85** ~~Walter Block and David Gordon, Blackmail, Extortion and Free Speech: A Reply to Posner, Epstein, Nozick and Lindgren, 19 Loy. L.A. L. Rev. 37 (1985). Available at: h p://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/llr/vol19/iss1/4 //BWSWJ~~~~ 13 +As defined, blackmail should not be accorded the legal sanctions usually meted out in 14 +AND 15 +, to threaten to do X. Blackmail is thus a noncriminal act. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-18 21:21:45.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Steve Knell - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +idk - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +61 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Brentwood Jackson Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JANFEB - KANT BLACKMAIL - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Berkeley
- Caselist.CitesClass[72]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,8 @@ 1 +====Counterplan Text: Public colleges and universities ought not restrict constitutionally protected speech except for posts on RateMyProfessors.com and other related teacher rating websites==== 2 + 3 + 4 +====RateMyProfessors ratings reflect racism towards Asian professors and cause criticism for their accents==== 5 +Subtirelu 15 ~~Subtirelu, Nicholas Close. ""She does have an accent but…": Race and language ideology in students' evaluations of mathematics instructors on RateMyProfessors. com." Language in Society 44.01 (2015): 35-62. //BWSWJ~~ 6 +I return now to my original research questions, attempting to provide answers to them 7 +AND 8 +to comment on 'Asian' instructors' language serves as a disadvantage for them. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-19 04:44:51.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Matt Conrad - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Loyola - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +63 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Brentwood Jackson Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JANFEB - RATEMYPROFESSORS PIC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Berkeley
- Caselist.CitesClass[73]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,14 @@ 1 +Prescriptive claims can’t be derived from descriptive properties like how we descriptively reason. Explanatory meta-ethical accounts of morality commit a conceptual error. Morality exists to explain what is right, not what is so. 2 +Reader Reader, Soren. Late Professor of Philosophy, Durham University “New Directions in Ethics: Naturalism, Reasons, and Virtue.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 3, No. 4, Dec. 2000. 3 +What is the … need to go. 4 +Instead, a virtue paradigm views ethics as a developmental social phenomenon in which the pre-existing moral categories and inculcated as a disposition. 5 +Reader 2: Reader, Soren. Late Professor of Philosophy, Durham University “New Directions in Ethics: Naturalism, Reasons, and Virtue.” Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, Vol. 3, No. 4, Dec. 2000. 6 +Virtue is a … what constitutes it. 7 +Thus the standard is Promoting Human Flourishing. 8 +Contention 9 +The state has an obligation to inculcate civic virtue. 10 +Smith: George H. Smith FEB 28, 2012 The Roots of State Education Part 3: Aristotle and Civic Virtue formerly Senior Research Fellow for the Institute for Humane Studies, a lecturer on American History for Cato Summer Seminars, and Executive Editor of Knowledge Products. Smith's fourth book, The System of Liberty, was recently published by Cambridge University Press. 11 +Aristotle explicitly repudiated … of the State….” 12 +That entails restricting university speech. 13 +Byrne 91, J. Peter Byrne (Associate Professor, Georgetown University Law Center), Racial Insults and Free Speech Within the University, 79 Geo. L.J. 399 (1991). 14 +The university’s relationship … been insufficiently studied. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-20 20:44:33.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Joseph, James, and Hughes - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lynbrook YZ - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +64 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Triples - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Brentwood Jackson Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JANFEB - VIRTUE ETHICS - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Berkeley
- Caselist.CitesClass[74]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,11 @@ 1 +I will not be reading PICs out of specific types or methods of constitutionally protected speech against affs that are not parametricized at the USC tournament. 2 + 3 +Examples of pics I can't read: 4 +Only restrict hate speech 5 +Only restrict revenge porn 6 +Only restrict journalist speech 7 + 8 +Examples I can still read: 9 +Word PICs 10 +Process PICs 11 +Agent PICs - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-03 21:00:07.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +READ THIS - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +READ THIS - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +67 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Brentwood Jackson Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 - IMPORTANT USC NOTE - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +READ THIS
- Caselist.CitesClass[77]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,10 @@ 1 +Counterplan text: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict constitutionally protected journalist speech except for publication of personally identifying information of child victims of crimes 2 +Jones et al 10 Jones, Lisa M., David Finkelhor, and Jessica Beckwith. "Protecting victims’ identities in press coverage of child victimization." Journalism 11.3 (2010): 347-367. //BWSWJ 3 +This study demonstrates that identifying information about child victims appears in media reports with considerable regularity. What we do not know and cannot say with authority, however, is how frequently or seriously this impacts on victims. Some research, discussed in the introduction, suggests that such coverage could add substantially to a victim’s sense of shame and anxiety or inhibit their recovery. Personal quotes and individual anecdotes provide evidence that it happens in at least some cases (Haws and Ramsey, 1996; Riski and Grusin, 2003). In addition, fears of media disclosure may also play a role in the reluctance of some victims or their families to report crimes to authorities or cooperate in criminal cases, as at least one survey suggested (Kilpatrick et al., 1992). The appearance of identifying information in news accounts may add to this concern, making it harder to promote disclosure. But no research has yet been undertaken to determine how often and to what degree these negative consequences occur. Such research is badly needed and could be easily incorporated into studies of child victimization. In follow-up studies of samples of victimized children and their families, for example, questions about the impact of media exposure need to be asked. In community surveys of victims, their concerns about the potential negative impact of being identified in the media need to be assessed, and its connection to reporting or non-reporting evaluated. Until such research is done, we need to be cautious, but there is substantial cause for concern. Even without direct evidence of its negative impact, discussions about media practices are warranted. Media organizations and public policy in general already recognize and accept the potential for negative impact on victims from media exposure. This recognition is reflected in the policies observed by many media outlets to withhold the names of sexual assault victims (Thayer and Pasternack, 1994). It is also implicit in the laws and practices protecting juvenile offenders from media exposure (Davis, 2000). 4 +Publication of child victims information can extremely harm abuse victims and make them less likely to report crimes toward them 5 +Jones et al 10 Jones, Lisa M., David Finkelhor, and Jessica Beckwith. "Protecting victims’ identities in press coverage of child victimization." Journalism 11.3 (2010): 347-367. //BWSWJ 6 +While media publicity is likely to have a negative effect on all victims, there is evidence to be particularly concerned about child victims. Children have the capacity for feelings of shame and embarrassment as early as 3 or 4 years old and research has demonstrated that by the age of 10, youth can experience shame just by guessing or assuming that others are evaluating them negatively (Abrams, 1988; Bennett, 1989; Bennett and Gillingham, 1991). Child abuse experts note that children may be more likely to develop shame in the wake of traumatic experiences because their views of themselves are still forming (Deblinger and Runyon, 2005). The effects of the publicity of their victimization may also be particularly hard on children because their self-concept is so dependent upon others, peers in particular (see for example, Adler and Adler, 1998; McLellan and Pugh, 1999). By middle childhood, anxiety about peer relationships intensifies and reputation becomes very important to children (Hill and Pillow, 2006; Parker and Gottman, 1989). Children as young as 8 years old perceive that associating with a stigmatized person may affect their own reputation (Bennett et al., 1998). The stigma of abuse or victimization could lead to avoidance and rejection by a child’s peers, which in turn is associated with isolation, loneliness, impaired school performance and the greater likelihood of future social problems that can persist into adulthood (Asher and Coie, 1990; Buhs and Ladd, 2001; Dodge et al., 2003). Furthermore, research on victimization and bullying suggests that a past history of victimization and a reputation as a victim sometimes causes children to be targeted for further hazing, exclusion and victimization (Schwartz et al., 1993). The US justice system already recognizes the need for particular protections for children. A key element of juvenile justice systems in almost all states is an enhanced level of confidentiality for juvenile offenders beyond the protections afforded to adult offenders – for example, sealed records and closed hearings (Regoli and Hewitt, 2006). These provisions are based in part on an assumption that stigma is particularly detrimental to the development of youth, and that it inhibits opportunities to grow beyond the constraints of unfavorable childhood circumstances. These same arguments also apply to juvenile victims. Child victims need to be able to trust that their privacy will be protected as much as possible by those whom they have turned to for help. The alternative means not only the risk of heightened distress, as the evidence presented above suggests, but also the possibility that fewer victims will come forward to get help at all. Victims are very concerned about the possibility that their private trauma may be broadcast publicly. In one study, over half the surveyed rape victims reported that they would be ‘a lot’ more likely to report an attack to the police if there was a law prohibiting the news media from disclosing their name 7 + 8 +Publishing personal info of child crime victims is extremely common – it puts children at risk 9 +Jones et al 10 Jones, Lisa M., David Finkelhor, and Jessica Beckwith. "Protecting victims’ identities in press coverage of child victimization." Journalism 11.3 (2010): 347-367. //BWSWJ 10 +Our review found that newspaper articles on child victimization commonly included identifying information about the child. In 51 percent of the articles we reviewed, at least one type of identifying information about the child was included. Table 2 presents the frequency with which different types of identifying information about the child were included in newspaper coverage for all reviewed articles. Rates were also calculated separately for articles covering sexual and non-sexual victimizations. The most directly identifying source of information, the child’s name, was included in 9 percent of the child victimization articles we reviewed. While it was rare for newspapers to publish the child’s name in reports of child sexual assault, the name was printed in 21 percent of the articles covering non-sexual assaults against children. In coverage of non-sexual victimizations (most typically physical abuse and neglect), we found that it was relatively common for newspapers to publish information about where the child lives, and to include the full name of either a non-offending caregiver or a family member offender. Overall, in newspaper coverage of non-sexual victimizations, at least one type of identifying information about children was included in 78 percent of the articles we reviewed. - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-04 22:08:32.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Torson - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +HW VC - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +69 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Brentwood Jackson Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JANFEB - Child Victims Journalism PIC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +USC
- Caselist.CitesClass[78]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,41 @@ 1 +====Confidence in government is low now==== 2 +Higgins 1/30 ~~Eoin Higgins, 1-30-2017, "The Left Needs to Go All the Way, and Demand Trump's Resignation," pastemagazine, https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2017/01/liberals-need-to-go-all-the-way-and-demand-trumps.html //BWSWJ~~ 3 +It’s not only Trump. The people have no confidence in their government as a 4 + 5 +AND 6 + 7 +and working to keep that cycle going with voter suppression and political repression. 8 + 9 + 10 + 11 +====Thus Counterplan Text: Public colleges and universities in the United States ought not restrict constitutionally protected speech to free speech zones except for protests within 500 feet of funerals by the Westboro Baptist Church==== 12 + 13 + 14 + 15 +====That competes==== 16 +NYT EDITORS 12 ~~Editors Page 8-12-2012, "Free Speech at Military Funerals," http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/13/opinion/free-speech-at-military-funerals.html~~ 17 +The Constitution shields even hateful protests like those of the Westboro Baptist Church, which 18 + 19 +AND 20 + 21 +its message that God is punishing the United States for tolerance of homosexuality. 22 + 23 + 24 + 25 +====Allowing funeral protests kill trust in government – the counterplan solves==== 26 +Suesz 12 ~~Suesz, Kendra. "America versus Westboro Baptist Church: The Legal Battle to Preserve Peace at the Funerals of Fallen Soldiers." (2012) //BWSWJ~~ 27 +Funeral protest is a current and sensitive topic. Americans hold great pride and respect 28 + 29 +AND 30 + 31 +of spreading God's message that Americans are doomed to hell for tolerating homosexuality. 32 + 33 + 34 + 35 +====Distrust in government leads to the death of political opposition and resistance – turns the aff’s internal link==== 36 +Freeland Summarizing Hirschman 11 ~~Chrystia Freeland summarizing Hirschman (Albert Otto Hirschman was an influential economist and the author of several books on political economy and political ideology. His first major contribution was in the area of development economics. Here he emphasized the need for unbalanced growth) , 8-5-2011, "What happens when citizens lose faith in government?," Reuters, http://blogs.reuters.com/chrystia-freeland/2011/08/05/what-happens-when-citizens-lose-faith-in-government/ //BWSWJ~~ 37 +Tolstoy thought unhappy families were unique in their unhappiness. But when it comes to 38 + 39 +AND 40 + 41 +this age of exit, do we have much chance of reforming them? - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-06 03:21:52.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Panel - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Jonas Swagbarillec - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +70 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Semis - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Brentwood Jackson Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JANFEB - WESTBORRO BAPTIST CHURCH FREE SPEECH ZONES PIC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +USC
- Caselist.CitesClass[79]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,3 @@ 1 +Numerous international law conventions require countries to place restrictions on any hate speech or discriminatory expression 2 +Bell 09 Bell, Jeannine. "Restraining the Heartless: Racist Speech and Minority Rights." Indiana Law Journal 84.3 (2009). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1618848 //BWSWJ 3 +The approach taken … incite racial discrimination.108 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-30 14:50:42.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Danny Li - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Scarsdale ZG - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +71 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Brentwood Jackson Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +JANFEB - Ilaw Off - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +TOC
- Caselist.RoundClass[62]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-19 04:44:31.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Matt Conrad - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Loyola - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Berkeley
- Caselist.RoundClass[63]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +72 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-19 04:44:48.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Matt Conrad - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Loyola - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Berkeley
- Caselist.RoundClass[64]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +73 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-02-20 20:44:29.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Joseph, James, and Hughes - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Lynbrook YZ - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Triples - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,5 @@ 1 +1AC - Kant 2 +1NC - Must spec evaluative method Virtue Case 3 +1AR - Must have neg advocacy text all 4 +2NR - Theory Kant 5 +2AR - Theory - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Berkeley
- Caselist.RoundClass[66]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-03 20:59:43.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +READ THIS - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +READ THIS - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +READ THIS
- Caselist.RoundClass[67]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +74 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-03 21:00:05.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +READ THIS - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +READ THIS - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Finals - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +READ THIS
- Caselist.RoundClass[68]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +75 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-04 22:04:33.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Torson - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +HW VC - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +USC
- Caselist.RoundClass[69]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +76,77 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-04 22:08:29.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Torson - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +HW VC - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +3 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +USC
- Caselist.RoundClass[70]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +78 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-03-06 03:21:51.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Panel - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Jonas Swagbarillec - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Semis - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +USC
- Caselist.RoundClass[71]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +79 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-30 14:50:40.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Danny Li - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Scarsdale ZG - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,5 @@ 1 +1AC - Constitutionality 2 +1NC - 3 shells Ilaw Turn Presume Neg Case 3 +1AR - All 4 +2NR - Theory Presumption 5 +2AR - Theory - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +TOC
- Caselist.RoundClass[72]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-30 20:05:18.57 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Eric Emerson - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Peninsula JL - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +TOC
- Caselist.RoundClass[73]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2017-04-30 20:05:55.876 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Eric Emerson - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Peninsula JL - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +TOC