Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[43]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[43]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,7 +1,0 @@
1		-Extend their condo logic spike, vote for me because they've conceded the round.
2		-
3		-Here's why:
4		-
5		-• It’s false that if my opponent concedes this round, my opponent hasn’t conceded this round
6		-
7		-This statement is logically true, otherwise it would be a contradiction, you can’t both concede and not concede. Under material conditional theory, a statement is only false is A is true and B is false. That would prove that the if statement does not trigger the then statement. Because the premise accepts the statement is false, the only possible conclusion under material conditional theory is that the A premise, that my opponent concedes, is true. You can sign the ballot now.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-09-21 23:24:14.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Michael Harris

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-idk

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-37

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Brentwood Jackson Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1 - CONDOLOGICMUSTDIE OFF

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Loyola