| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,97 @@ |
|
1 |
+AC |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+Framework |
|
4 |
+I value morality. |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+The standard is maximizing expected wellbeing. |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+Ethical frameworks must be theoretically legitimate |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+A. Ground – |
|
11 |
+B. Topic lit – |
|
12 |
+C. Topic education – |
|
13 |
+Fairness is a |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+Plan |
|
17 |
+Production of nuclear power by North Korean energy reactors creates weapons-grade plutonium and enriched uranium– this is directly linked with North Korea’s military nuclear capacity. |
|
18 |
+Roncari 15 |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+Satellite pictures suggest … a nuclear arsenal. |
|
21 |
+ |
|
22 |
+NoKo has the the raw material – and is on the verge of developing the capability to deliver it via missile – now is key – U.S. intelligence proves. BBC 16 |
|
23 |
+ |
|
24 |
+North Korea's nuclear … of uranium ore. |
|
25 |
+ |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+NoKo uses the excuse of energy development to advance their military programs – international efforts to curb this have consistently failed – domestic action on nuclear power is key. NTI 16 |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+In the late … generating needed electricity. |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+Thus the plan: The Democratic People’s Republic of Korea ought to prohibit the production of nuclear power. |
|
32 |
+ |
|
33 |
+We’ll Isolate two scenarios. |
|
34 |
+ |
|
35 |
+Scenario 1: Escalation |
|
36 |
+Increased North Korean Prolif creates regional instability –increases U.S military posturing and tension. Spector 15 |
|
37 |
+ |
|
38 |
+The advent of … Pyongyang and Beijing. |
|
39 |
+ |
|
40 |
+Conflict leads to rapid escalation, especially with nuclear weapons – leads to massive retaliation. Cha and Gallucci 16 |
|
41 |
+ |
|
42 |
+There are other …, a massive retaliation. |
|
43 |
+ |
|
44 |
+That causes lash out – NoKo is willing to do it – history proves. Davis 15 |
|
45 |
+ |
|
46 |
+In other words, … his regime's survival. |
|
47 |
+ |
|
48 |
+It's the most dangerous country on earth – miscalculation ensures broad escalation. Metz 13 |
|
49 |
+ |
|
50 |
+Today, North Korea … happened in statecraft. |
|
51 |
+ |
|
52 |
+That goes global and nuclear. Cordesman 13 |
|
53 |
+ |
|
54 |
+The tensions between … to past experiences. |
|
55 |
+ |
|
56 |
+Scenario 2 – ROK Relations |
|
57 |
+NoKo’s nuclear program will drive a wedge between U.S.–SoKo relations. Fisher 7/13 |
|
58 |
+ |
|
59 |
+Mr. Fitzpatrick argued … those of its allies. |
|
60 |
+ |
|
61 |
+NoKo’s nuclear program is a key determiner of U.S.-South Korean relations. Blumenthal 15 |
|
62 |
+ |
|
63 |
+2) Twenty-one years … and Seoul desire. |
|
64 |
+ |
|
65 |
+South Korea Alliance Solves U.S.-China Conflict – Acts as a Mediator. Roehrig 7 |
|
66 |
+ |
|
67 |
+South Korea has … a competitor.58 |
|
68 |
+ |
|
69 |
+US China war escalates – extinction. Riqiang 13 |
|
70 |
+ |
|
71 |
+The two articles … may be difficult. |
|
72 |
+ |
|
73 |
+Under-view |
|
74 |
+ |
|
75 |
+1. Nebel and Plural T assume an unreasonably high threshold for topicality – aff just has to be an instance of the resolution – anything else is a debate over parametrics. Overing 14 |
|
76 |
+ |
|
77 |
+As Nebel assumes … on quasi-policy topics. |
|
78 |
+ |
|
79 |
+1. Evaluate theory and topicality against the aff advocacy with the reasonability brightline of structural abuse |
|
80 |
+2. Solutions to oppression need to be grounded in policy rather than abstraction. K’s must be tied to an implementable, political solution to be effective. Bryant |
|
81 |
+The problem as I …. Good luck with that. |
|
82 |
+ |
|
83 |
+ |
|
84 |
+ JEAN-BAPTISTE RONCARI. TRANSLATED BY LUCIE PERRIER. “North Korea: A Race to Nuclear Energy.” Ejournalinternational.fr. 14 Février 2015//FT |
|
85 |
+ British Broadcasting Corporation, international news network, “North Korea's nuclear programme: How advanced is it?” February 10th, 2016, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pacific-11813699) http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/mobile/world-asia-pacific-11813699 |
|
86 |
+ Nuclear Threat Initiative, experts and analysts that work together to designs innovative threat-reduction projects that show governments the way and build momentum and support for action, “North Korea: Nuclear,” April, 2016, http://www.nti.org/learn/countries/north-korea/nuclear/ 1970s to 1993: Indigenous Development Under the Radar of the International Community |
|
87 |
+ LEONARD S. SPECTOR. “The Future Impact of North Korea’s Emerging Nuclear Deterrent on Nuclear Nonproliferation.” NOVEMBER 2015//FT |
|
88 |
+ Victor Cha and Robert L. Galluccijan, reporters @ the NY Times, “Stopping North Korea’s Nuclear Threat,” January 8, 2016, http://www.nytimes.com/2016/01/08/opinion/stopping-north-koreas-nuclear-threat.html |
|
89 |
+ Mark W, former White House speechwriter, now a director of the Texas-based Uptown Creative Strategies Group, “The Slow Nuclear Bomb Boil,” May 8, 2015, http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/mark-davis/2015/05/08/north-koreas-nuclear-bomb-buildup-is-a-real-threat |
|
90 |
+ Steven Metz 13, Chairman of the Regional Strategy and Planning Department and Research Professor of National Security Affairs at the Strategic Studies Institute, 3/13/13, “Strategic Horizons: Thinking the Unthinkable on a Second Korean War,” http://www.worldpoliticsreview.com/articles/12786/strategic-horizons-thinking-the-unthinkable-on-a-second-korean-war |
|
91 |
+ Anthony H. Cordesman holds the Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy at CSIS, former national security assistant to Senator John McCain, former adjunct professor of national security studies at Georgetown University, and has twice been a Wilson fellow at the Woodrow Wilson Center for Scholars at the Smithsonian, and Ashley Hess, research intern at CSIS pursuing her MA in International Relations at Seoul National University, BA in IR and Classics from Brown University Providence. “The Evolving Military Balance in the Korean Peninsula and Northeast Asia” June 2013 http://csis.org/files/publication/130513_KMB_volume1.pdf |
|
92 |
+ Max, reporter @ the NY Times, “Maybe North Korea’s Nuclear Goals Are More Serious Than Once Thought,” JULY 13, 2016, http://www.nytimes.com/2016/07/14/world/asia/maybe-north-koreas-nuclear-goals-arent-a-farce-after-all.html?rref=collection2Ftimestopic2FNorth20Korea27s20Nuclear20Program |
|
93 |
+ Daniel, Director of Asian Studies at the American Enterprise Institute, “Five Issues That Will Decide the Future of the U.S.-Korean Relationship,” October 15th, 2015, http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/10/15/five-issues-that-will-decide-the-future-of-the-u-s-korean-relationship/ |
|
94 |
+ Daniel, Director of Asian Studies at the American Enterprise Institute, “Five Issues That Will Decide the Future of the U.S.-Korean Relationship,” October 15th, 2015, http://foreignpolicy.com/2015/10/15/five-issues-that-will-decide-the-future-of-the-u-s-korean-relationship/ |
|
95 |
+ Wu, Associate Professor of International Studies at Renmin University of China, June 21, “Issues in Sino-US Nuclear Relations: Survivability, Coercion and Escalation,” https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/issues-in-sino-us-nuclear-relations-survivability-coercion-and-escalation/issues-in-sino-us-nuclear-relations-survivability-coercion-and-escalation |
|
96 |
+ Bob Overing Loyola Coach, ToC Finalist “Topicality and Plans in LD: A Reply to Nebel by Bob Overing” Premier Debate. December 11, 2014. http://premierdebatetoday.com/2014/12/11/topicality-and-plans-in-ld-a-reply-to-nebel-by-bob-overing///FT |
|
97 |
+ Levi R. Bryant, Professor of Philosophy at Collin College, holds a Ph.D. in Philosophy from Loyola University in Chicago, 2012 (“Underpants Gnomes: A Critique of the Academic Left,” Larval Subjects—Levi R. Bryant’s philosophy blog, November 11th, Available Online at http://larvalsubjects.wordpress.com/2012/11/11/underpants-gnomes-a-critique-of-the-academic-left/, Accessed 02-21-2014) |