| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,11 @@ |
|
1 |
+heir faith in deliberation - that we should ‘convince the racist’ - is grounded in color-blind paternalism. It places faith in white virtue and imposes a burden that results in antiblack violence. |
|
2 |
+Delgado and Yun ’94: (Richard Delgado and David H. Yun, Pressure Valves and Bloodied Chickens: An Analysis of Paternalistic Objections to Hate Speech Regulation, 82 Cal. L. Rev. 871 (1994)//FT) |
|
3 |
+Regulation, 82 Cal. L. Rev. 871 (1994) D. "More Speech"-Talking Back to the Aggressor as a... for educating others? |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+The alternative is to destroy and demystify the concept of the white man and white virtue— we are an anti-ethical approach that calls out the free speech excuse for what it is: an excuse for racism. |
|
6 |
+Dr. Tommy J. Curry 13, Assistant Professor, Department of Philosophy, Texas AandM, "In the Fiat of Dreams: The Delusional Allure of Hope, the Reality of Anti-Black Violence and the Demands of the Anti-Ethical", 2013 RG |
|
7 |
+Anti-ethics; the call...nigger-souls, is totalizing. |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+The role of the ballot is to vote for the debate who best methodologically challenges structural violence. |
|
10 |
+Smith ’13: (Elijah Smith. “A Conversation in Ruins: Race and Black Participation in Lincoln Douglas Debate.” Vbriefly. September 6, 2013//FT) |
|
11 |
+At every tournament...students cannot escape. |