Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[0]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[0]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,13 +1,0 @@
1		-The affirmative is an attempt by the state to appease indigenous people while willfully ignoring that the state’s existence is contingent on colonialist domination. The kritik is not a question of mutual exclusivity, but one of priorities. Failing to address colonialist expansion on indigenous lands as a FIRST PRIORITY ensures further imperialist domination kills solvency and turns case Churchill 96
2		-
3		-I’ll debunk some r on non-Indians.
4		-
5		-
6		-Positing the law as a savior of indigenous Americans willfully ignores the brutal colonialist relationship between it and Native Americans. Calling on the law to help them while ignoring the legacy of colonialism paints Native Americans as helpless and in need of white salvation Williams
7		-After the dramatic…rights and federalism.
8		-
9		-The alternative is a rejection of the affirmative in favor of pursuing land return as a FIRST PRIORITY. Only through an unflinching struggle against the seemingly impossible are we able to end colonialist domination. The alt is a question of priorities, the aff’’s action without first returning land entrenches subjugation of indigenous people Churchill 96
10		-The question which…vision of “impossible realism.” Isn’t it time we all worked on attaining it?
11		-
12		-Environmental destruction of Native lands is inevitable without control of title to land Jacques
13		-Currently, federal Indian….this mosaic of destruction.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-10-08 17:10:25.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-X

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-X

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Brentwood DeConcini Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Land K

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-X