| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,20 @@ |
|
1 |
+Litigation deflects attention for other strategies of social change that are more effective at solving the case—this turns their case and then some: |
|
2 |
+Van Schaack, 2004 Assistant Prof. of Law @ Santa Clara University School of Law, Vanderbilt Law Review, November, 2004, (Beth, 57 Vand. L. Rev. 2305; Lexis, rwg) |
|
3 |
+Although litigation can...the targeted country. |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+Human rights litigation has a flypaper effect—it attracts litigants to the courts and undermines social change: |
|
6 |
+Van Schaack, 2004 Assistant Prof. of Law @ Santa Clara University School of Law, Vanderbilt Law Review, November, 2004, (Beth, 57 Vand. L. Rev. 2305; Lexis) |
|
7 |
+Indeed, practitioners of...and economic problems. n9 |
|
8 |
+ |
|
9 |
+Courts cause backlash against social movements: turning the case: |
|
10 |
+Idit Kostiner, 2003, Jurisprudence and Social Policy Program, University of California, 2003 “Evaluating Legality: Toward a Cultural Approach to the Study of Law and Social Change”, June, Error! Hyperlink reference not valid., rwg |
|
11 |
+Following Scheingold's argument...for social reform. |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+Empirically proven - Individual court decisions cause civil rights demonstrations to decrease |
|
14 |
+James T. Patterson, 2001 Ford Foundation Professor of History, Brown University, 2001 “The Troubled Legacy of Brown v. Board,” http://wwics.si.edu/topics/pubs/ACF236.pdf |
|
15 |
+Rosenberg and others... after the decision. |
|
16 |
+ |
|
17 |
+This is specifically true for LGBTQ+ movements. |
|
18 |
+Schacter ’06 Jane S. Schacter* James E. and Ruth B. Doyle-Bascom Professor of Law, University of Wisconsin Law School; Edwin A. Heafey, Jr. Visiting Professor of Law, Stanford Law School, 2005-2006; A.B., University of Pennsylvania, 1980; J.D., Harvard University, 1984. Drake Law Review Summer |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+There is an...own caricatured qualities. |