Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[0]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[0]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[0]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-09-10 18:52:56.35
	1	+2016-09-10 18:52:56.0

Caselist.CitesClass[0]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,56 @@
	1	+Part 1 is the Framework
	2	+
	3	+The Role of the ballot is minimizing structural barriers towards indigenous people
	4	+
	5	+Focusing on which ethical ideology is best makes applicable discussion impossible, and causes debate to divorce itself from empirical realities. Instead we must ground our analysis of the resolution in real-world struggles that plague society. Curry
	6	+Despite the pronouncement…seek to address.
	7	+
	8	+The judge ought to vote for debaters who best challenges oppressive structures. This is a side constraint on adjudication because we’re only debaters for four years. The purpose of debate education should be to train youth to challenge oppressive structures, not perpetuate them. Bohmer ’91 bracketed “Teaching Privileged Students about Gender, Race, and Class Oppression.” Teaching Sociology, Vol. 19, No. 2 (April, 1991) pp. 154-163.
	9	+Our a strong account…the sociology curriculum.
	10	+
	11	+The only method to respond to institutional violence is through understanding and criticizing the grammar that informs it. Andreotti ’08 bracketed Mapping interpretations of decolonization in the context of higher education
	12	+As the inaugural…(critiques of) modernity.
	13	+
	14	+The violence that modernity creates is only understood through coloniality. Coloniality represents a total relation of power that over determines other forms of violence. This means that other impacts under structural violence, while important, are not essential to the level of ontology that colonialism creates. Andreotti 2 bracketed Mapping interpretations of decolonization in the context of higher education
	15	+Walter Mignolo’s (2000a; 2011) work…in modernity’s “shine.”
	16	+
	17	+Part 2 are the Harms
	18	+Colonialism still exist. The US gov’t devastates indigenous populations through major radiation and theft of land. This practice destroys the lives and identity of Native Americans. And debate is key, public discussion and awareness stops neglect. The Rhetoric of Nuclear Colonialism: Rhetorical Exclusion of American Indian Arguments in the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Siting Decision Danielle Endres ’09 bracketed
	19	+Nuclear colonialism is…Pine Ridge reservation.16
	20	+
	21	+Nuclear Colonialism uses deliberative practices to systematically excludes Indigenous voices. These practice denies the identity of Native Americans and allows the gov’t to enact blatant racism. And, the government uses national interest and greater good ideologies to perpetuates their genocide. The Rhetoric of Nuclear Colonialism: Rhetorical Exclusion of American Indian Arguments in the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Siting Decision Danielle Endres 2 bracketed
	22	+ Despite the nuanced…is never complete.’’82
	23	+
	24	+Empirical proof of these horrors exist within the history of the western world. Our masked practices thoroughly annihilate populations and enact the literal extinction of the subject. Porter
	25	+Nonetheless, this otherwise…point of extinction.
	26	+
	27	+Part 3 is the advocacy
	28	+The advocacy is to prohibit the production of nuclear power within American Indian nations. This entails proclaiming their lands as Nuclear Free Zones, and includes banning uranium mining and waste storage. The Rhetoric of Nuclear Colonialism: Rhetorical Exclusion of American Indian Arguments in the Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Siting Decision Danielle Endres 3 bracketed
	29	+This essay is…to nuclear colonialism.
	30	+
	31	+Solutions to oppression need to be grounded in policy rather than abstraction. K’s must be tied to an implementable, political solution to be effective. Bryant
	32	+The problem as…luck with that.
	33	+
	34	+Policymaking is key to political activism. Coverstone
	35	+An important concern….in America today.
	36	+
	37	+Colonialism has infiltrated every aspect of modernity. These impositions of violence deny the subject existence within society. Imperialist desires views subjects as disposable and their lives as mere footnotes. These practices entirely dehumanize they subject as well as the actor. Kelly
	38	+Our account is…of the outside.
	39	+
	40	+The alterative to this barbaric violence is to employ “system hospicing”. Modernity is collapsing but has engrained itself through our society. Our task is to nurse the system as it’s on its way out. We must learn from mistakes and experiment with alternatives. This entails uprooting its products, such as colonialism, by utilizing “beyond-reform” spaces. The aff doesn’t work inside of modernity nor rejects it completely. Instead, we work alongside the system to remain impartial. Only within this space can one criticize the ideologies behind structural violence because we can see the system for what it is. I advocate that investigating system hospcing illustrates that ending arms provisions to foreign insurgents dismantles colonialistic practice and is an essential part of clearing the space. Andreotti 3
	41	+In contrast to…hacking, or ‘hospicing’.
	42	+
	43	+In academic settings like debate we ought to examine and deconstruct power relations. This is key to highlighting subjectivity and developing the skills necessary for social change. Trifonas 2003 Trifonas, Peter. Department of Curriculum at University of Toronto. PEDAGOGIES OF DIFFERENCE: RETHINKING EDUCATION FOR SOCIAL CHANGE. New York, London. 2003.
	44	+The idea of…for social justice.
	45	+
	46	+Additionally, spreading America’s might subordinates the state and allows America to act as an international police. Jameson 10 Fredric Jameson, “Valences of the Dialectic”, November 8 2010, Wiley Interscience
	47	+In discussions of…ticklish subject—nationalism.
	48	+
	49	+And, continued imperialism results in extinction because modern wars have all been the result of some imperialist conquest. Harvey 06 David Harvey, “Spaces of Global Capitalism: A Theory of Uneven Geographical Development”, May 17 2006, Chapter 13
	50	+At times of…of global war.
	51	+
	52	+The alternative is questioning the ideological objectives underlying arms supplying through negating. Fisher 13.“The Insidious Nature of ‘Democracy Promotion’: The Case of the Westminster Foundation for Democracy” Corporate Watch AT
	53	+The ‘democracy’ that…throughout the world.
	54	+
	55	+The role of the ballot is rejecting imperialism Sachs 03.  Aaron Sachs, “The Ultimate "Other": Post-Colonialism and Alexander Von Humboldt's Ecological Relationship with Nature”, History and Theory, December 2003, http://www.jstor.org/stable/3590683
	56	+There is no…process of colonization."16

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-09-10 18:52:58.299

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+X

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+X

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+0

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Brentwood DeConcini Aff

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Colon K

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Loyola