Changes for page Brentwood Blume Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:33
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[6]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,5 +1,0 @@ 1 -Interpretation: My interpretation for the model of debate is that the burden of the aff is to develop and advocacy from within the bounds of the resolution ~-~-- this doesn’t constrain the aff to every specific word in the res ~-~-- but ultimately we should still have a debate about the TOPIC. 2 -1. Equal Research Burdens 3 -2. Clash 4 -3. Effective Dialogue- Topical fairness requirements are key to effective dialogue—monopolizing strategy makes the discussion one-sided and exclusionary 5 -Galloway Samford Comm prof (Ryan, Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, Vol. 28, 2007) “debate as a dialogue … of topical advocacy.” - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2016-10-15 16:32:42.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Bob Overing - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Stuyvesant KL - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Brentwood Blume Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Non-Topical Affs T - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Bronx