Changes for page Brentwood Blume Neg
Summary
-
Objects (2 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[6]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-10-15 16:30:11. 6161 +2016-10-15 16:30:11.0
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-10-15 16:32:41. 571 +2016-10-15 16:32:41.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[6]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,5 @@ 1 +Interpretation: My interpretation for the model of debate is that the burden of the aff is to develop and advocacy from within the bounds of the resolution ~-~-- this doesn’t constrain the aff to every specific word in the res ~-~-- but ultimately we should still have a debate about the TOPIC. 2 +1. Equal Research Burdens 3 +2. Clash 4 +3. Effective Dialogue- Topical fairness requirements are key to effective dialogue—monopolizing strategy makes the discussion one-sided and exclusionary 5 +Galloway Samford Comm prof (Ryan, Contemporary Argumentation and Debate, Vol. 28, 2007) “debate as a dialogue … of topical advocacy.” - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-15 16:32:42.369 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Bob Overing - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Stuyvesant KL - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +6 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Brentwood Blume Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Non-Topical Affs T - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Bronx