Changes for page Bellarmine Pillai Neg
Summary
-
Objects (0 modified, 2 added, 4 removed)
Details
- Caselist.CitesClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,31 +1,0 @@ 1 -Contention 1: Framework 2 -Rejecting institutional racism is a pre-requisite to all other moral and ethical theories—it depraves morality and makes violence structurally inevitable. 3 -Memmi 2k (Albert, Professor Emeritus of Sociology @ Unv. Of Paris; RACISM, translated by Steve Martinot, pp.163, *I don’t endorse anthropocentric language) 4 - 5 -Thus, the standard is resisting conditions of racism. 6 - 7 -In addition: 8 -Prioritize structural calculus because putting low-probability, worst-case thinking papers over systemic impacts, destroys effective decision-making, and justifies endless violence and interventionism. 9 -Schneier 10 (05/12/10, Bruce Schneier is a fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School and a program fellow at the New America Foundation's Open Technology Institute, He is an an internationally renowned security technologist, called a "security guru" by The Economist. He is the author of 12 books ~-~- including Liars and Outliers: Enabling the Trust Society Needs to Thrive ~-~- as well as hundreds of articles, essays, and academic papers. His influential newsletter "Crypto-Gram" and his blog "Schneier on Security" are read by over 250,000 people. He has testified before Congress, is a frequent guest on television and radio, has served on several government committees, and is regularly quoted in the press. Schneier is a fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School, a program fellow at the New America Foundation's Open Technology Institute, a board member of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an Advisory Board Member of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, and the Chief Technology Officer at Co3 Systems, Inc. He has a Ph. D. from the University of Westminster by the Department of Electronics and Computer Science, “Worst-case thinking makes us nuts, not safe”, http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/05/12/schneier.worst.case.thinking/ we do not endorse this author’s intent of ableist language and apologize for it, we have left it intact to preserve the article’s completeness) 10 - 11 -Contention 2: Crime 12 -Qualified immunity protects police from the burden of lawsuits 13 -Schott 12 (Richard G., J.D. “Qualified Immunity; How It Protects Law Enforcement Officers.” FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. 2012. https://leb.fbi.gov/2012/september/qualified-immunity-how-it-protects-law-enforcement-officers) 14 - 15 -Lack of immunity would open police up to a flood of litigation that hamgstrings law enforcement 16 -King 16 (Andrew. Assistant Prosecuting Attorney. “Keep Qualified Immunity… For Now.” Mimesis Law. 1 July 2016. http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/keep-qualified-immunity-for-now/11010) 17 - 18 -The aff would increase suits – forces police to spend more time in the court room instead of policing outside of it 19 -Rosen 05 (Michael M., Graduated from Harvard Law School in 2003. “A Qualified Defense: In Support of the Doctrine of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Cases, With Some Suggestions for its Improvement,” 35 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 2005. http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ggulrev/vol35/iss2/2) 20 - 21 -Decline of active, engaged, and proactive policing drives crime rates up caused by police fear of backlash 22 -Hofstetter 16 (George, President of the Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs. “Proactive policing and the violent crime rate.” 2016. http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?m=1119707513166andca=4a80a442-8caf-45c4-97ca-745c0f1b6f88) 23 - 24 -Damage due to crime induces fear of crime within communities and disincentives incoming residents 25 -Gibbons 04 (Steve Stephen, Lecturer London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) - Department of Geography and Environment. “The Costs of Urban Property Crime.” The Economic Journal, vol. 11, no. 499, 2004, pp. F441-F463 http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3590167.pdf?seq=1) 26 - 27 -Protective measures, reactions, and community disorganization in fear of crime makes it more difficult for poorer, marginalized communities to fend against crime – perpetuates redistribution of crime between these communities 28 -Doran and Burgess 11 (Bruce J. and Melissa B. of the Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University. “Why Is Fear of Crime a Serious Social Problem.” 25 Jul 2011. http://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda_downloaddocument/9781441956460-c1.pdf?SGWID=0-0-45-1200548-p173946017) 29 - 30 -This perpetuation of crime affects African American and Hispanic communities disproportionally 31 -Ulmer et. al 12 (Jeffrey T., professor of sociology and criminology at Pennsylvania State University; Casey T. Harris, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville with expertise in Quantitative Social Research; Darrel J. Steffensmeier, Professor of sociology and criminology at Pennsylvania State University. “Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Structural Disadvantage and Crime: White, Black, and Hispanic Comparisons.” 29 May 2012. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4097310/) - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-06 00:40:41.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Erik Legried - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Apple Valley TE - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Bellarmine Pillai Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -NovDec 2016 NC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Glenbrooks
- Caselist.CitesClass[3]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,27 +1,0 @@ 1 -==Part 1 is Framework== 2 -=I value Morality since the word ‘ought’ in the resolution implies a moral obligation.= 3 - 4 -=Questions of morality and normativity arise from reflective endorsement of desires and impulses.= 5 -Korsgaard 1 (Christine M. Korsgaard – Philosopher, Professor of Philosophy at Harvard, Former President of the Eastern Division of the American Philosophical Association – “The Sources of Normativity.” The Tanner Lectures on Human Value. Delivered at Clare Hall, Cambridge University. 16 and 17 Nov 1992.) 6 -"The human mind ... to an end?" 7 - 8 -=Reflection creates a conception of practical identity – this gives us reason and obligations.= 9 -Korsgaard 2 (Christine M. Korsgaard – Philosopher, Professor of Philosophy at Harvard, Former President of the Eastern Division of the American Philosophical Association – “The Sources of Normativity.” The Tanner Lectures on Human Value. Delivered at Clare Hall, Cambridge University. 16 and 17 Nov 1992.) 10 -"Those who think ... that identity forbids" 11 - 12 -=Violations of human dignity lead to fundamental loss of identity – means there is an unconditional moral obligation not to violate human dignity.= 13 -Korsgaard 3 (Christine M. Korsgaard – Philosopher, Professor of Philosophy at Harvard, Former President of the Eastern Division of the American Philosophical Association – “The Sources of Normativity.” The Tanner Lectures on Human Value. Delivered at Clare Hall, Cambridge University. 16 and 17 Nov 1992.) 14 -"It is the conception ... from reflective rejection" 15 - 16 -=Thus, the standard is preserving human dignity.= 17 - 18 -==Part 2 is Contention== 19 -=Hate speech is an example of constitutionally protected speech – it’s independent of fighting words, threats, and inciting crime.= 20 -Carroll 15 (Lauren Carroll – Writer for Politifact, majored in political science at Duke University in 2014 – “CNN's Chris Cuomo: First Amendment doesn't cover hate speech.” Politifact. 7 May 2015. http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/may/07/chris-cuomo/cnns-chris-cuomo-first-amendment-doesnt-cover-hate/) 21 -"For example, if ... threatening, he said" 22 - 23 -=The psychological damage of hate speech harms human dignity – this is uniquely important in the context of colleges and universities.= 24 -Myhra 92 (Alison G. Myhra – Assitant Professor at Texas Tech University School of Law, J.D. from University of North Dakota in 1985, L.L.M. from Harvard University in 1991 – “The Hate Speech Conundrum and the Public Schools.” North Dakota Law Review. 1992. http://repository.law.ttu.edu/bitstream/handle/10601/632/myhra5.pdf?sequence=1andisAllowed=y) 25 -"From the victim's ... epithets and insults" 26 - 27 -=Thus, public colleges and universities have moral justification to restrict at least one form of constitutionally protected speech – hate speech – in order to preserve human dignity. This is sufficient to negate.= - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-06 05:27:23.946 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Kaitlin Coltin - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Pinnacle KA - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -3 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Bellarmine Pillai Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -JanFeb 2017 Human Dignity NC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -ASU
- Caselist.RoundClass[2]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2 - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-06 00:40:39.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Erik Legried - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Apple Valley TE - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Glenbrooks
- Caselist.RoundClass[3]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -2017-01-06 05:27:21.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Kaitlin Coltin - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -Pinnacle KA - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -1 - RoundReport
-
... ... @@ -1,3 +1,0 @@ 1 -AC - Kant 2 -NC - Human Dignity 3 -NR - Human Dignity - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,0 @@ 1 -ASU
- Caselist.CitesClass[0]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,31 @@ 1 +Contention 1: Framework 2 +Rejecting institutional racism is a pre-requisite to all other moral and ethical theories—it depraves morality and makes violence structurally inevitable. 3 +Memmi 2k (Albert, Professor Emeritus of Sociology @ Unv. Of Paris; RACISM, translated by Steve Martinot, pp.163, *I don’t endorse anthropocentric language) 4 + 5 +Thus, the standard is resisting conditions of racism. 6 + 7 +In addition: 8 +Prioritize structural calculus because putting low-probability, worst-case thinking papers over systemic impacts, destroys effective decision-making, and justifies endless violence and interventionism. 9 +Schneier 10 (05/12/10, Bruce Schneier is a fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School and a program fellow at the New America Foundation's Open Technology Institute, He is an an internationally renowned security technologist, called a "security guru" by The Economist. He is the author of 12 books ~-~- including Liars and Outliers: Enabling the Trust Society Needs to Thrive ~-~- as well as hundreds of articles, essays, and academic papers. His influential newsletter "Crypto-Gram" and his blog "Schneier on Security" are read by over 250,000 people. He has testified before Congress, is a frequent guest on television and radio, has served on several government committees, and is regularly quoted in the press. Schneier is a fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School, a program fellow at the New America Foundation's Open Technology Institute, a board member of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an Advisory Board Member of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, and the Chief Technology Officer at Co3 Systems, Inc. He has a Ph. D. from the University of Westminster by the Department of Electronics and Computer Science, “Worst-case thinking makes us nuts, not safe”, http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/05/12/schneier.worst.case.thinking/ we do not endorse this author’s intent of ableist language and apologize for it, we have left it intact to preserve the article’s completeness) 10 + 11 +Contention 2: Crime 12 +Qualified immunity protects police from the burden of lawsuits 13 +Schott 12 (Richard G., J.D. “Qualified Immunity; How It Protects Law Enforcement Officers.” FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. 2012. https://leb.fbi.gov/2012/september/qualified-immunity-how-it-protects-law-enforcement-officers) 14 + 15 +Lack of immunity would open police up to a flood of litigation that hamgstrings law enforcement 16 +King 16 (Andrew. Assistant Prosecuting Attorney. “Keep Qualified Immunity… For Now.” Mimesis Law. 1 July 2016. http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/keep-qualified-immunity-for-now/11010) 17 + 18 +The aff would increase suits – forces police to spend more time in the court room instead of policing outside of it 19 +Rosen 05 (Michael M., Graduated from Harvard Law School in 2003. “A Qualified Defense: In Support of the Doctrine of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Cases, With Some Suggestions for its Improvement,” 35 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 2005. http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ggulrev/vol35/iss2/2) 20 + 21 +Decline of active, engaged, and proactive policing drives crime rates up caused by police fear of backlash 22 +Hofstetter 16 (George, President of the Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs. “Proactive policing and the violent crime rate.” 2016. http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?m=1119707513166andca=4a80a442-8caf-45c4-97ca-745c0f1b6f88) 23 + 24 +Damage due to crime induces fear of crime within communities and disincentives incoming residents 25 +Gibbons 04 (Steve Stephen, Lecturer London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) - Department of Geography and Environment. “The Costs of Urban Property Crime.” The Economic Journal, vol. 11, no. 499, 2004, pp. F441-F463 http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3590167.pdf?seq=1) 26 + 27 +Protective measures, reactions, and community disorganization in fear of crime makes it more difficult for poorer, marginalized communities to fend against crime – perpetuates redistribution of crime between these communities 28 +Doran and Burgess 11 (Bruce J. and Melissa B. of the Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University. “Why Is Fear of Crime a Serious Social Problem.” 25 Jul 2011. http://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda_downloaddocument/9781441956460-c1.pdf?SGWID=0-0-45-1200548-p173946017) 29 + 30 +This perpetuation of crime affects African American and Hispanic communities disproportionally 31 +Ulmer et. al 12 (Jeffrey T., professor of sociology and criminology at Pennsylvania State University; Casey T. Harris, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville with expertise in Quantitative Social Research; Darrel J. Steffensmeier, Professor of sociology and criminology at Pennsylvania State University. “Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Structural Disadvantage and Crime: White, Black, and Hispanic Comparisons.” 29 May 2012. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4097310/) - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-20 18:33:57.602 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Erik Legried - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Apple Valley TE - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +0 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Bellarmine Pillai Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +ND 2016 NC - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Glenbrooks
- Caselist.RoundClass[0]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-11-20 18:33:55.0 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Erik Legried - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Apple Valley TE - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +1 - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Glenbrooks