| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,31 @@ |
|
1 |
+Contention 1: Framework |
|
2 |
+Rejecting institutional racism is a pre-requisite to all other moral and ethical theories—it depraves morality and makes violence structurally inevitable. |
|
3 |
+Memmi 2k (Albert, Professor Emeritus of Sociology @ Unv. Of Paris; RACISM, translated by Steve Martinot, pp.163, *I don’t endorse anthropocentric language) |
|
4 |
+ |
|
5 |
+Thus, the standard is resisting conditions of racism. |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+In addition: |
|
8 |
+Prioritize structural calculus because putting low-probability, worst-case thinking papers over systemic impacts, destroys effective decision-making, and justifies endless violence and interventionism. |
|
9 |
+Schneier 10 (05/12/10, Bruce Schneier is a fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School and a program fellow at the New America Foundation's Open Technology Institute, He is an an internationally renowned security technologist, called a "security guru" by The Economist. He is the author of 12 books ~-~- including Liars and Outliers: Enabling the Trust Society Needs to Thrive ~-~- as well as hundreds of articles, essays, and academic papers. His influential newsletter "Crypto-Gram" and his blog "Schneier on Security" are read by over 250,000 people. He has testified before Congress, is a frequent guest on television and radio, has served on several government committees, and is regularly quoted in the press. Schneier is a fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School, a program fellow at the New America Foundation's Open Technology Institute, a board member of the Electronic Frontier Foundation, an Advisory Board Member of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, and the Chief Technology Officer at Co3 Systems, Inc. He has a Ph. D. from the University of Westminster by the Department of Electronics and Computer Science, “Worst-case thinking makes us nuts, not safe”, http://www.cnn.com/2010/OPINION/05/12/schneier.worst.case.thinking/ we do not endorse this author’s intent of ableist language and apologize for it, we have left it intact to preserve the article’s completeness) |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+Contention 2: Crime |
|
12 |
+Qualified immunity protects police from the burden of lawsuits |
|
13 |
+Schott 12 (Richard G., J.D. “Qualified Immunity; How It Protects Law Enforcement Officers.” FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin. 2012. https://leb.fbi.gov/2012/september/qualified-immunity-how-it-protects-law-enforcement-officers) |
|
14 |
+ |
|
15 |
+Lack of immunity would open police up to a flood of litigation that hamgstrings law enforcement |
|
16 |
+King 16 (Andrew. Assistant Prosecuting Attorney. “Keep Qualified Immunity… For Now.” Mimesis Law. 1 July 2016. http://mimesislaw.com/fault-lines/keep-qualified-immunity-for-now/11010) |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+The aff would increase suits – forces police to spend more time in the court room instead of policing outside of it |
|
19 |
+Rosen 05 (Michael M., Graduated from Harvard Law School in 2003. “A Qualified Defense: In Support of the Doctrine of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Cases, With Some Suggestions for its Improvement,” 35 Golden Gate U. L. Rev. 2005. http://digitalcommons.law.ggu.edu/ggulrev/vol35/iss2/2) |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+Decline of active, engaged, and proactive policing drives crime rates up caused by police fear of backlash |
|
22 |
+Hofstetter 16 (George, President of the Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs. “Proactive policing and the violent crime rate.” 2016. http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?m=1119707513166andca=4a80a442-8caf-45c4-97ca-745c0f1b6f88) |
|
23 |
+ |
|
24 |
+Damage due to crime induces fear of crime within communities and disincentives incoming residents |
|
25 |
+Gibbons 04 (Steve Stephen, Lecturer London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE) - Department of Geography and Environment. “The Costs of Urban Property Crime.” The Economic Journal, vol. 11, no. 499, 2004, pp. F441-F463 http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3590167.pdf?seq=1) |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+Protective measures, reactions, and community disorganization in fear of crime makes it more difficult for poorer, marginalized communities to fend against crime – perpetuates redistribution of crime between these communities |
|
28 |
+Doran and Burgess 11 (Bruce J. and Melissa B. of the Fenner School of Environment and Society, The Australian National University. “Why Is Fear of Crime a Serious Social Problem.” 25 Jul 2011. http://www.springer.com/cda/content/document/cda_downloaddocument/9781441956460-c1.pdf?SGWID=0-0-45-1200548-p173946017) |
|
29 |
+ |
|
30 |
+This perpetuation of crime affects African American and Hispanic communities disproportionally |
|
31 |
+Ulmer et. al 12 (Jeffrey T., professor of sociology and criminology at Pennsylvania State University; Casey T. Harris, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville with expertise in Quantitative Social Research; Darrel J. Steffensmeier, Professor of sociology and criminology at Pennsylvania State University. “Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Structural Disadvantage and Crime: White, Black, and Hispanic Comparisons.” 29 May 2012. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4097310/) |