Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[14]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[15]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[14]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-10-09 19:32:18.296
	1	+2016-10-09 19:32:18.0

Caselist.CitesClass[15]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,17 @@
	1	+A. Interpretation: The term “Countries” means the aff can only defend countries in general, not any specific country or a set of countries. Debois 16
	2	+Debois 16, Danny, VBI Topic Analysis Sept-Oct, p.11, 2016
	3	+Importantly, "countries" in...should prohibit it.
	4	+B. Violation: They defend a subset- either 1 or group
	5	+C. Standards:
	6	+Textual Precision- Generic bare plurals lack a quantifier before it which means debate is supposed to be about countries in general, not any specific group of employers.. Leslie
	7	+Sarah Jane Leslie. Prof. of Linguistics. “Generics.” https://www.princeton.edu/~sjleslie/RoutledgeEncyclopediaEntry2.pdf
	8	+Generics are statements...this practice here.)
	9	+
	10	+And there’s a topical version of the aff: Countries prohibiting the production of nuclear power through a phase-out program. Lucas et. al 12
	11	+Lucas, Caroline, Rebecca Harms, and Dany Cohn-Bendit. "Why We Must Phase out Nuclear Power." Theguardian. Theguardian, 17 Feb. 2012. Web. 8 Oct. 2016. PH
	12	+There’s inherent risk...nuclear on power.
	13	+
	14	+Limits- There are about 195 countries. The aff vastly underlimits the topic by allowing them to defend ANY ONE of them.
	15	+
	16	+D. Voter:
	17	+Fairness, Education, Drop the Debater, Competing Interps, and No RVI

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-10-09 19:32:18.571

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+David Dosch

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Brentwood EL

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+14

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+3

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Beckman Matsuo Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+SEPTOCT T- Debois

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Voices