Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[0]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[0]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[0]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-09-11 07:03:11.295
	1	+2016-09-11 07:03:11.0

Caselist.CitesClass[0]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,17 @@
	1	+some of these are analytics:
	2	+
	3	+To negate means to deny the truth of and to affirm means to prove the truth of something and to say that something is true.
	4	+
	5	+The resolution exists not as a static rational object of analysis, but as a malleable product of our attachments and sentiments. Debate is made of texts, and so examining the resolution with literary analysis is the key mechanism that allows argumentation to occur at all – we already engage with affect in debate, but limiting our engagement to feelings we’re familiar with dooms us to accept dominant explanations for what matters. Our negation marks a critical literary analysis of our attachments that bridges the gap between the theoretical and the material while avoiding a cruel optimism that forces a static attachment to already experienced history.
	6	+
	7	+If the interp is logically sound don’t evaluate T
	8	+_______
	9	+
	10	+Third, No amount of subjective evidence can ever prove objective knowledge. Searle writes:
	11	+
	12	+
	13	+
	14	+External world skep negates since linguistically when we predicate properties on a given subject, such as when we say “developing nations ought to value environmental protection” we are asserting both that developing nations and the environment exist. Russel
	15	+
	16	+
	17	+Fourth, Determinism is true Inwagen

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-09-11 07:03:13.28

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Adam Bistagne

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Brentwood KM

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+0

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+4

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Beckman Matsuo Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Neg Cites

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Loyola