Summary

• Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
  • Caselist.RoundClass[2]
  • Caselist.CitesClass[4]

Details

Caselist.RoundClass[2]

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,1 @@
1		-2016-12-16 18:55:16.496
	1	+2016-12-16 18:55:16.0

Caselist.CitesClass[4]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,59 @@
	1	+Framework
	2	+First, ethical theories that create moral rules without having referents in the current social context fail to analyze asymmetries in discrimination. Mills
	3	+Mills, C. W. (2009), Rawls on Race/Race in Rawls. The Southern Journal of Philosophy
	4	+Now how can
	5	+AND
	6	+history of discrimination.
	7	+
	8	+An equal system of rights is the only just system and is a pre-requisite to any other political theory. Sen
	9	+Amartya Sen Thomas W Larmont University Professor and Professor of Economics and Philosophy at Harvard University. "The Idea of Justice." Penguin Publishing. 2010. Print AJ
	10	+Equality was not
	11	+AND
	12	+would respectively matter.†
	13	+
	14	+Thus the standard is minimizing oppression
	15	+
	16	+A. Advocacy Framing
	17	+Only balancing free speech against the rights of victims promotes equality for all. Scott 94:
	18	+Catlin 94, Scott J. Catlin, “Proposal for Regulating Hate Speech in the United States: Balancing Rights under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights”, 69 Notre Dame L. Rev. 771 (1994). http://scholarship.law.nd.edu/ndlr/vol69/iss4/4
	19	+The belief that
	20	+AND
	21	+rights of each. 196
	22	+
	23	+The negative advocacy is that the public colleges and universities ought to restrict hate speech through specifically delineated speech codes. Hemmer further explains
	24	+Hemmer 2K, Joseph J. Hemmer, Jr. (Professor and Chairperson of the Communication Department, Carrol College , Waukesha, Wisconsin). “Hate Speech Codes: A Narrow Perspective.” North Dakota Journal of Speech and Theatre. Sep 2000, Vol. 13, p21. http://www2.edutech.nodak.edu/ndsta/hemmer.htm
	25	+Any potentially acceptable
	26	+AND
	27	+victim’s self-image (Owsley, 1992-1993, 331).
	28	+
	29	+A. Direct Harms
	30	+Hate speech imposes major long term psychological impacts on its victims Delgado
	31	+Delgado 82, Delgado, Richard (University of Alabama School of Law), “Words that Wound: A Tort Action for Racial Insults, Epithets, and Name-Calling”. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, Vol. 17, p. 133, 1982; Seattle University School of Law Research Paper. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2000918
	32	+In addition to the harms
	33	+AND
	34	+accept those judgments.76
	35	+
	36	+Empirics prove. Hate speech causes hate crimes. Singh
	37	+Hansdeep Singh, 9-6-2012, "The Rise of Hate Crimes Can Be Tied Directly to Hateful Speech," Daily Beast, http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/09/06/the-rise-of-hate-crimes-can-be-tied-directly-to-hateful-speech.html" Co-Founder and Director of Legal Programs for the International Center for Advocates Against Discrimination (ICAAD).
	38	+ statistics provide a consistent
	39	+AND
	40	+“othering” of minority communities.
	41	+
	42	+A. Structural Harms
	43	+Unlike other legally limited speech, hate speech harms a select segment of the population who is already disadvantaged Matsuda 1:
	44	+Matsuda, Mari J. "Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim's Story." Michigan Law Review 87.8 (1989): 2320-381. JSTOR. Web. 8 Dec. 2016.
	45	+Unlike the victims
	46	+AND
	47	+more grossly violated.
	48	+
	49	+Allowing for hate speech throws state power and authorization behind racist and abhorrent policies and elevates the speakers above the targets Matsuda 2:
	50	+Matsuda, Mari J. "Public Response to Racist Speech: Considering the Victim's Story." Michigan Law Review 87.8 (1989): 2320-381. JSTOR. Web. 8 Dec. 2016.
	51	+The third doctrinal
	52	+AND
	53	+self-aware victim acknowledges it.1
	54	+
	55	+Hate speech poses a direct threat to the oppressed. Banning it is necessary to promote inclusiveness.
	56	+Jared Taylor summarizes Waldron, 12, Why We Should Ban “Hate Speech”, American Renaissance, summarizing Jeremy Waldron, The Harm in Hate Speech, Harvard University Press, 2012, 292 pp., 26.95. 8/24/12, http://www.amren.com/features/2012/08/why-we-should-ban-hate-speech/ **Note – Taylor does not agree with but is summarizing Waldron’s position //LADI
	57	+First-Amendment guarantees
	58	+AND
	59	+drive out minorities.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2016-12-16 18:55:19.522

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Leah Shapiro

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Scarsdale ML

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Round

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+2

Team

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Apple Valley Ek Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Hate Speech NC

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,0 +1,1 @@
	1	+Blake