| ... |
... |
@@ -1,13
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-CP Text: The United States Government should limit qualified immunity through a clearly established constitutional right to recording police except in instances where the recording was secret. |
| 2 |
|
-It competes – plan establishes a clearly established unlimited constitutional right to recording the police with no qualifiers. 1ar perms prove lack of specification causes abuse and kills the ability of the neg to establish counterplan competition. |
| 3 |
|
-The counterplan is better – it solves the case and avoids setting a precedent for illegal surveillance. |
| 4 |
|
-Steve Silverman, 4-10-2012, "7 Rules for Recording Police," Gizmodo, http://gizmodo.com/5900680/7-rules-for-recording-police |
| 5 |
|
-In most states it's almost always |
| 6 |
|
-AND |
| 7 |
|
-not be possible or appropriate unless police approach you. |
| 8 |
|
- |
| 9 |
|
-Secret recordings violate privacy |
| 10 |
|
-HSNW, 9-20-2011, "Can citizens legally," No Publication, http://www.homelandsecuritynewswire.com/can-citizens-legally-and-secretly-record-police-officers-action |
| 11 |
|
-Last month, the 1st Circuit ruled |
| 12 |
|
-AND |
| 13 |
|
-There is such a thing as privacy.” |