Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[2]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[2]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,20 +1,0 @@
1		-Text: The United States federal government should maintain qualified immunity and
2		-1. Be more conscientious about evaluating issues against the relevant precedent in a way that embraces the methodology and true holding of that precedent
3		-2. More often conduct a prong-one analysis to define the right implicated in the issues of a given case. Wagner 14:
4		-Robin B. Wagner 14, JD candidate at DePaul College of Law, “Are Gay Rights Clearly Established?: The Problems with the Qualified Immunity Doctrine”, 63 DePaul L. Rev. 869 (2014) Available at: http://via.library.depaul.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029andcontext=law-review
5		-In three cases of government
6		-AND
7		-right implicated in the issues of a given case.
8		-
9		-It competes – the counterplan doesn’t limit QI but modifies current QI procedure which is conceptually distinct – the gutcheck is if someone read this as an aff, it would lose to T-Limit
10		-First plank prevents abuse of precedent and ensures accurate holding to prior precedent – status quo QI procedures are plagued with Courts unwilling to engage with the hard task of evaluating precedent – CP solves that. Wagner 14:
11		-Robin B. Wagner 14, JD candidate at DePaul College of Law, “Are Gay Rights Clearly Established?: The Problems with the Qualified Immunity Doctrine”, 63 DePaul L. Rev. 869 (2014) Available at: http://via.library.depaul.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029andcontext=law-review
12		-Conscientious evaluation of presented issues against existing precedent
13		-AND
14		-clearly established right in play.
15		-
16		-Second plank requires courts to more thoroughly examine allegations of constitutional rights – that ensures more cases remain active, encourages settlements, prevents undermining previous precedent, and sets a model for future decisions that more clearly establishes future rights. Wagner 14:
17		-Robin B. Wagner 14, JD candidate at DePaul College of Law, “Are Gay Rights Clearly Established?: The Problems with the Qualified Immunity Doctrine”, 63 DePaul L. Rev. 869 (2014) Available at: http://via.library.depaul.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029andcontext=law-review
18		-The key to avoiding such negative outcomes
19		-AND
20		-indeed violated an individual’s clearly established right.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-11-19 23:04:04.0

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Cypress Woods LC

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-3

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Apple Valley Ek Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Wagner CP

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Glenbrooks