Changes for page Apple Valley Boals Neg
Last modified by Administrator on 2017/08/29 03:33
Change comment:
There is no comment for this version
Summary
-
Objects (1 modified, 1 added, 0 removed)
Details
- Caselist.RoundClass[7]
-
- EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,1 +1,1 @@ 1 -2016-10-15 19:23:00. 891 +2016-10-15 19:23:00.0
- Caselist.CitesClass[9]
-
- Cites
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,45 @@ 1 +====Interpretation – White people may only garner offense from hypothetical enactment of the resolution or a topical plan.==== 2 +Resolved reflects policy passage before a legislative body. Parcher 01 3 +(Jeff, Fmr. Debate Coach at Georgetown University, February, http://www.ndtceda.com/archives/200102/0790.html) 4 +(1) Pardon me if I turn to a source besides Bill. American 5 +AND 6 +or 'no' - which, of course, are answers to a question. 7 + 8 + 9 +====Merriam Webster defines "country"==== 10 +an area of land that is controlled by its own government 11 +http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/country 12 + 13 + 14 +==== "Prohibit" means legal enforcement==== 15 +Dictionary.com http://www.dictionary.com/browse/prohibit 16 +to forbid (an action, activity, etc.) by authority or law: 17 + 18 + 19 +====B is the Violation: they don't defend a legal action and CX proves—if you prove the topic is bad that still doesn't disprove her advocacy.==== 20 + 21 + 22 +====C: Standards==== 23 + 24 + 25 +====Whiteness is fluid-their refusal to defend the state is representative of the white people's legal fluidity during the beginnings of the colonial state-white people set laws for everyone and then broke them themselves in order to escape responsibility for their actions. Natives and the USFG made treaties and then the USFG broke them and refused to take responsibility.==== 26 + 27 + 28 +====Next is switch side. Fluidity is the strategy of whiteness, able to mold and shape itself to avoid being identified and to remain invisible.==== 29 + 30 + 31 +====Switch side debate is blackness – Conviction based debate is whiteness.==== 32 +**Evans, 2012**. Rashad. JD Penn. http://www.rwesq.com/the-3nr/ November 21 33 +I agree with this argument. However, you have no warrant to support the 34 +AND 35 +the solution to the ills you identify. Your argument has been turned. 36 + 37 + 38 +====It's a voting issue - You fail to ground your discourse in materiality – you don't defend anything and understand the impacts of your inaction==== 39 +Rashad **Evans** writes while debating Casey Harrigan in **2012**: Rashad Evans, 2012 11-20-2012 (http://www.rwesq.com/the-1nc/) 40 +A quare approach to debate includes afro-pessimism. For instance, I am 41 +AND 42 +. Responsible debaters also engage in knowledge production and not just knowledge consumption. 43 + 44 + 45 +====Also, T version of the aff solves-just defend the state, they don't get to cross apply their state bad arguments if they are white, its not relevant to them and allows them to avoid their own social location.==== - EntryDate
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +2016-10-15 19:23:01.852 - Judge
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Idk - Opponent
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Winston Churchill - ParentRound
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +7 - Round
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +4 - Team
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Apple Valley Boals Neg - Title
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +T-White People - Tournament
-
... ... @@ -1,0 +1,1 @@ 1 +Marx