Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[4]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[4]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,21 +1,0 @@
1		-Text: The United States courts or insert aff actor here should maintain qualified immunity
2		-- Be more conscientious about evaluating issues against the relevant precedent in a way that embraces the methodology and true holding of that precedent
3		-- More often conduct a prong-one analysis to define the right implicated in the issues of a given case
4		-Robin B. Wagner 14, JD candidate at DePaul College of Law, “Are Gay Rights Clearly Established?: The Problems with the Qualified Immunity Doctrine”, 63 DePaul L. Rev. 869 (2014) Available at: http://via.library.depaul.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029andcontext=law-review
5		-In three cases of government officials denying their homosexual employees their clearly established equal protection
6		-AND
7		-analysis to define the right implicated in the issues of a given case.
8		-
9		-It competes – the counterplan doesn’t limit QI but modifies current QI procedure which is conceptually distinct – the gutcheck is if someone read this as an aff, it would lose to T-Limit
10		-
11		-First plank prevents abuse of precedent and ensures accurate holding to prior precedent – status quo QI procedures are plagued with Courts unwilling to engage with the hard task of evaluating precedent – CP solves that
12		-Robin B. Wagner 14, JD candidate at DePaul College of Law, “Are Gay Rights Clearly Established?: The Problems with the Qualified Immunity Doctrine”, 63 DePaul L. Rev. 869 (2014) Available at: http://via.library.depaul.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029andcontext=law-review
13		-Conscientious evaluation of presented issues against existing precedent is not inherently objective, nor should
14		-AND
15		-assured: there would no longer be a clearly established right in play.
16		-
17		-Second plank requires courts to more thoroughly examine allegations of constitutional rights – that ensures more cases remain active, encourages settlements, prevents undermining previous precedent, and sets a model for future decisions that more clearly establishes future rights
18		-Robin B. Wagner 14, JD candidate at DePaul College of Law, “Are Gay Rights Clearly Established?: The Problems with the Qualified Immunity Doctrine”, 63 DePaul L. Rev. 869 (2014) Available at: http://via.library.depaul.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1029andcontext=law-review
19		-The key to avoiding such negative outcomes for plaintiffs is for courts to employ the
20		-AND
21		-holding officials accountable when they have indeed violated an individual’s clearly established right.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-11-19 13:24:44.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		--

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		--

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-4

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Apple Valley Anderson Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-NovDec-Wagner CP

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Minneapple RR