| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,19 @@ |
|
1 |
+**The standard is consistency with a Kantian system of equal and outer freedom** |
|
2 |
+ |
|
3 |
+**Attempting to maximize freedom is incoherent – freedom must be treated as an inviolable side constraint** |
|
4 |
+Engstrom, Stephen. “Universal Legislation as the Form of Practical Knowledge.” N.d. Available from http://www.philosophie.uni-hd.de/md/philsem/engstrom_vortrag.pdf. |
|
5 |
+Given the preceding ... that same freedom |
|
6 |
+ |
|
7 |
+**Freedom is the key to the process of justification of arguments.** |
|
8 |
+James, Ostrowski, A SYMPOSIUM ON DRUG DECRIMINALIZATION: THE MORAL AND PRACTICAL CASE FOR DRUG LEGALIZATION. SPRING, 1990 18 Hofstra L. Rev. 607 |
|
9 |
+Argumentation is a ... principle of non-agression |
|
10 |
+ |
|
11 |
+**If we act like other rational agents would, then we shouldn’t be held responsible for consequences that aren’t part of the will.** |
|
12 |
+Arthur Ripstein, Equality, Responsibility, and the Law. Cambridge: |
|
13 |
+Cambridge University Press 1999 |
|
14 |
+I will develop ... done the same |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+**Allowing individual cops to be held culpable for all risks would violate their freedom** |
|
17 |
+Arthur Ripstein 2, Equality, Responsibility, and the Law. Cambridge: |
|
18 |
+Cambridge University Press 1999 |
|
19 |
+The same conception .. interests of others |