| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,16 @@ |
|
1 |
+Constraints are necessary to retain the value of freedom which implies that one cannot hinder the freedom of others. |
|
2 |
+Engstrom, Stephen. “Universal Legislation as the Form of Practical Knowledge.” N.d. Available from http://www.philosophie.uni-hd.de/md/philsem/engstrom_vortrag.pdf. |
|
3 |
+Given the preceding |
|
4 |
+that same freedom |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+The standard is consistency with a system of equal freedom. |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+Some speech is coercive – the individuals who run public institutions must enforce rules that prevent coercion – each act of speech is an act that can violate the public right of others. Thus the public will must prevent hate speech because it is coercive. |
|
9 |
+Varden ‘10, Helga. "A Kantian Conception of Free Speech." Freedom of Expression in a Diverse World. (2010) |
|
10 |
+Kant’s distinction between |
|
11 |
+of all citizens. |
|
12 |
+ |
|
13 |
+Hate speech is constitutionally protected |
|
14 |
+Volokh 15 Eugene Volokh, Gary T. Schwartz Professor of Law at the UCLA School of Law. , No, There’s No “hate Speech” Exception to the First Amendment, The Washington Post, 5/7/15, https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2015/05/07/no-theres-no-hate-speech-exception-to-the-first-amendment/ |
|
15 |
+I keep hearing |
|
16 |
+that I know of.) |