| ... |
... |
@@ -1,19
+1,0 @@ |
| 1 |
|
-**The standard is consistency with a Kantian system of equal and outer freedom** |
| 2 |
|
- |
| 3 |
|
-**Attempting to maximize freedom is incoherent – freedom must be treated as an inviolable side constraint** |
| 4 |
|
-Engstrom, Stephen. “Universal Legislation as the Form of Practical Knowledge.” N.d. Available from http://www.philosophie.uni-hd.de/md/philsem/engstrom_vortrag.pdf. |
| 5 |
|
-Given the preceding ... that same freedom |
| 6 |
|
- |
| 7 |
|
-**Freedom is the key to the process of justification of arguments.** |
| 8 |
|
-James, Ostrowski, A SYMPOSIUM ON DRUG DECRIMINALIZATION: THE MORAL AND PRACTICAL CASE FOR DRUG LEGALIZATION. SPRING, 1990 18 Hofstra L. Rev. 607 |
| 9 |
|
-Argumentation is a ... principle of non-agression |
| 10 |
|
- |
| 11 |
|
-**If we act like other rational agents would, then we shouldn’t be held responsible for consequences that aren’t part of the will.** |
| 12 |
|
-Arthur Ripstein, Equality, Responsibility, and the Law. Cambridge: |
| 13 |
|
-Cambridge University Press 1999 |
| 14 |
|
-I will develop ... done the same |
| 15 |
|
- |
| 16 |
|
-**Allowing individual cops to be held culpable for all risks would violate their freedom** |
| 17 |
|
-Arthur Ripstein 2, Equality, Responsibility, and the Law. Cambridge: |
| 18 |
|
-Cambridge University Press 1999 |
| 19 |
|
-The same conception .. interests of others |