Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[1]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[1]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,8 +1,0 @@
1		-===OFF 1-ROB Spec ===
2		-A: Interpretation: If the aff has pre-fiat arguments constraining offense then, the aff must specify a comprehensive role of the ballot and clarify how the round will play out under that role of the ballot in the form of a text in the 1AC. To clarify, the aff must: 1) Clarify how we determine what a legitimate advocacy is and how offense links back to the role of the ballot, such as whether topicality constrains the aff advocacy or not. 2) Every plank of the ROB must be warranted, just like the standard text for a normative ethical theory, and what area of debate must be warranted i.e. which assumptions we should accept and which we shouldn't. 3) Describe how to weigh and compare between competing advocacies i.e. whether the role of the ballot is solely determined by the flow or another method of engagement.
3		-B: Violation:
4		-C: Standards: 1) Engagement: analytics
5		-A) Education: analytics, **Chokshi** : When it comes …offers some advice:
6		-B) Link turn, analytics
7		-analytics
8		-D: Voters: analytics

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-09-18 12:53:32.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-John Staunton

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Acton Boxborough JH

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-0

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-American Heritage Boca Delray Datti Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-ROB Spec

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Yale