Summary

• Objects (0 modified, 0 added, 1 removed)
  • Caselist.CitesClass[4]

Details

Caselist.CitesClass[4]

Cites

...	...	@@ -1,5 +1,0 @@
1		-Text: Indigenous communities should individually decide for themselves whether they want to prohibit their participation in the production of nuclear power in their territories.
2		-Competition: The CP competes on mutual exclusivity; they decide for themselves so they don't necessarily prohibit the production of nuclear power. This means the perm is severance.
3		-Some indigenous communities see nuclear waste facilities as good. To clarify, my argument is not that all groups should hold the same view, but that they be given the opportunity to choose which the aff denies, **Gover et al 92** **: **The second and …for its development.
4		-Grouping several different indigenous identities together is reason to negate under your ROB; you don't take into account particularities which turns case as you re-entrench colonial domination by deciding what's best for indigenous communities without consulting them.
5		-Also, it doesn't matter that you read specific authors who don't want nuclear power; that's just reason they should prohibit nuclear power individually, which means CP solves the aff. My argument is that you shouldn't impose this on other groups.

EntryDate

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-2016-09-18 12:59:44.0

Judge

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Sam Azbel

Opponent

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Acton Boxborough AW

ParentRound

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-1

Round

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-3

Team

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-American Heritage Boca Delray Datti Neg

Title

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Consult CP

Tournament

...	...	@@ -1,1 +1,0 @@
1		-Yale