| ... |
... |
@@ -1,0
+1,34 @@ |
|
1 |
+Part One is the Framework |
|
2 |
+analytics |
|
3 |
+ |
|
4 |
+Additionally, inductive reasoning fails, so moral interpretations contingent on consequences are nonsensical, Hume (Hume, David. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, http://18th.eserver.org/hume-enquiry.html#4): That there are ... point in question. |
|
5 |
+ |
|
6 |
+analytics |
|
7 |
+ |
|
8 |
+Next, practical reason implies that we must base moral accountability on desert. Korsgaard (Korsgaard, Christine. “Creating The Kingdom of Ends: Reciprocity and Responsibility in Personal Relations.” (p. 306)): But in a ... to be human. |
|
9 |
+ |
|
10 |
+analytics |
|
11 |
+ |
|
12 |
+Part Two is the Burden |
|
13 |
+ |
|
14 |
+analytics |
|
15 |
+ |
|
16 |
+The neg has the proactive burden to prove a morally relevant distinction between police officers and the general public, who do not have the right to qualified immunity. Whereas, the aff needs to prove there exists no morally relevant distinction between the two. |
|
17 |
+ |
|
18 |
+analytics |
|
19 |
+ |
|
20 |
+ |
|
21 |
+Part Three is No Distinctions |
|
22 |
+ |
|
23 |
+analytics |
|
24 |
+ |
|
25 |
+Also, one's function within a society can never function as the foundation for a morally relevant distinction, Boyle and Lavin (Goodness and Desire Matthew Boyle and Douglas Lavin (2010, Harvard University) http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/4879173/Boyle_GoodnessDesire.pdf?sequence=2): In recognizing that ... calls a "soul."26 |
|
26 |
+ |
|
27 |
+analytics |
|
28 |
+ |
|
29 |
+Qualified immunity doesn't hold officers culpable for their actions, Chemerinksy 14 (Erwin Chemerinsky, Op-Ed Contributor http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/27/opinion/how-the-supreme-court-protects-bad-cops.html): When there is ... clearly been violated. |
|
30 |
+ |
|
31 |
+ |
|
32 |
+Part Four is the Underview |
|
33 |
+ |
|
34 |
+analytics |